• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

  • Articles
    • Public Policy
    • Privacy & Security
    • Human Rights
      • Ethics
      • JEDI (Justice, Equity, Diversity, Inclusion
    • Climate
    • Design
      • Emerging Technology
    • Application & Adoption
      • Health
      • Education
      • Government
        • Military
        • Public Works
      • Labour
    • Arts & Culture
      • Film & TV
      • Music
      • Pop Culture
      • Digital Art
  • Columns
    • AI Policy Corner
    • Recess
    • Tech Futures
  • The AI Ethics Brief
  • AI Literacy
    • Research Summaries
    • AI Ethics Living Dictionary
    • Learning Community
  • The State of AI Ethics Report
    • State of AI Ethics Report Volume 8 (2026): Call for Contributors
    • Volume 7 (November 2025)
    • Volume 6 (February 2022)
    • Volume 5 (July 2021)
    • Volume 4 (April 2021)
    • Volume 3 (Jan 2021)
    • Volume 2 (Oct 2020)
    • Volume 1 (June 2020)
  • About
    • Our Contributions Policy
    • Our Open Access Policy
    • Contact
    • Donate

Unsolved Problems in ML Safety

May 28, 2023

šŸ”¬ Research Summary by Dan Hendrycks, received his PhD from UC Berkeley where he was advised byĀ Dawn SongĀ andĀ Jacob Steinhardt. He is now the director of theĀ Center for AI Safety.

[Original paper by Dan Hendrycks, Nicholas Carlini, John Schulman, and Jacob Steinhardt]


Overview: As ML systems become more capable and integrated into society, the safety of such systems becomes increasingly important. This paper presents four broad areas in ML Safety: Robustness, Monitoring, Alignment, and Systemic Safety. We explore each area’s motivations and provide concrete research directions.


Introduction

Over five months, the Boeing 737 MAX crashed twice, killing 346 people. It was later determined that Boeing had made unsafe design choices and pressured inspectors to bring the plane to market more quickly.

Often, it takes a disaster like this for people to pay attention to safety concerns. As AI systems are rapidly improved and applied to new domains, failures will only become more consequential. It is, therefore, important for the ML research community to proactively design systems with safety in mind. As the adage goes, ā€œAn ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.ā€

How can we reduce the probability of high-consequence failures of AI systems? Our goal in writing ā€œConcrete Problems in ML Safetyā€ is to draw attention to this question and list some research directions that address it. We would love to see the ML Safety community grow and hope that our paper can help guide this area of research and document its motivations.

Key Insights

We describe four research problems:

  1. Robustness: how can we make systems reliable in the face of adversaries and highly unusual situations?
  2. Monitoring: how can we detect anomalies, malicious uses, and discover unintended model functionality?
  3. Alignment: how can we build models that represent and safely optimize difficult-to-specify human values?
  4. Systemic Safety: how can we use ML to address broader risks related to how ML systems are handled? Examples include ML for cyber security and improving policy decision-making.

This work is not the first to consider any of these areas. To view related literature, please refer to the original paper.

Robustness

Motivation

Current machine learning systems are not robust enough to handle real-world complexity and long-tail events. For example, failing to recognize a tilted stop sign, occluded, or represented on a LED matrix could cause loss of life.

Additionally, adversaries can easily manipulate vulnerabilities in ML systems and cause them to make mistakes. For example, adversaries may bypass the neural networks used to detect intruders or malware.

Some example directions

  • Create robustness benchmarks that incorporate large distribution shifts and long tail events.
  • Prevent competent errors where agents wrongly generalize and execute wrong routines.
  • Improve system abilities to adapt and learn from novel scenarios. 
  • Explore defenses to adversarial attacks with an unknown specification (beyond the typical ā€˜lp ball’ setting).
  • Develop adversarial defenses that can adapt at test time. 

Monitoring

Motivation

When AI systems are deployed in high-stakes settings, it will be important for human operators to be alerted when there is an anomaly, an attack, or if the model is uncertain so that they can intervene. Also, capabilities have been known to emerge unexpectedly in AI systems. Human operators should understand how models function and what actions they can take to avoid unwanted surprises.

Some example directions

  • Improve model calibration (the appropriateness of output probabilities) and extend expressions of uncertainty to natural language.
  • Train models to more accurately report the knowledge available to them.
  • Detect when data has been poisoned, or back doors have been inserted into models.
  • Develop a testbed to screen for potentially hazardous capabilities, such as the ability to execute malicious user-supplied code, generate illegal or unethical forms of content, etc.

Alignment

Motivation

While most technologies do not have goals and are simply tools, future machine learning systems may act to optimize objectives. Aligning objective functions with human values requires overcoming societal and technical challenges.

Some example directions

  • Align specific technologies, such as recommender systems, with well-being rather than engagement.
  • Detect when ethical decisions are clear-cut or contentious.
  • Train models to learn difficult-to-specify goals in interactive environments.
  • Improve the robustness of reward models.
  • Design minimally invasive agents that prefer easily reversible to irreversible actions.
  • Teach ML systems to abide by rules and constraints specified in natural language.
  • Mitigate and detect unintended instrumental goals such as self-preservation or power-seeking.
  • Have agents balance and optimize many values since there is no agreement about the best set.

Systemic Safety

ML systems are more likely to fail or be misdirected if the larger context in which they operate is insecure or turbulent. One research direction that can help combat this is ML for cyber security. There may be strong incentives for attackers to steal ML models, which could be used in dangerous ways or inherently dangerous and not fit for proliferation. ML could be used to develop better defensive systems that reduce the risk of attacks.

Another research direction in this category is ML for informed decision-making. Even if ML systems are safe in and of themselves, they must still be used safely. During the cold war, misunderstanding and political turbulence exposed humanity to several close calls and brought us to the brink of catastrophe, demonstrating that systemic issues can make technologies unsafe. Using ML to help institutions make more informed decisions may help to combat these risks.

Between the lines

Ultimately, our goal as researchers should not just be to produce interesting work but to help steer the world in a better direction. We hope to highlight some safety problems that may be under-emphasized. This list was far from comprehensive, and we would be enthusiastic about further research into reducing high-consequence risks that may arise in the future.

Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

SAIER Volume 8 (2026)

SAIER Volume 8 (2026) Call for Contributors

šŸ” SEARCH

Spotlight

Vertically- and horizontally-placed chess boards and chess pieces

Tech Futures: At the Frontier of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt

Tech Futures: Introducing the Resist List

An abstract spiral of dark circles appears at the centre, resembling a tornado. Several vintage magazine covers and advertisements are being drawn toward the spiral. The artworks that have already been pulled into it are becoming distorted and replaced with clusters of numbers representing their numerical embeddings.

Tech Futures: Better Imagination for Better Tech Futures

This image is a collage with a colourful Japanese vintage landscape showing a mountain, hills, flowers and other plants and a small stream. There are 3 large black data servers placed in the bottom half of the image, with a cloud of black smoke emitting from them, partly obscuring the scenery.

Tech Futures: Crafting Participatory Tech Futures

A network diagram with lots of little emojis, organised in clusters.

Tech Futures: AI For and Against Knowledge

related posts

  • Research summary: Different Intelligibility for Different Folks

    Research summary: Different Intelligibility for Different Folks

  • Longitudinal Fairness with Censorship

    Longitudinal Fairness with Censorship

  • How Do We Teach Tech Ethics? How Should We?

    How Do We Teach Tech Ethics? How Should We?

  • The Ethics of AI in Finance

    The Ethics of AI in Finance

  • ā€œCold Hard Dataā€ – Nothing Cold or Hard About It

    ā€œCold Hard Dataā€ – Nothing Cold or Hard About It

  • The E.U.’s Artificial Intelligence Act: An Ordoliberal Assessment

    The E.U.’s Artificial Intelligence Act: An Ordoliberal Assessment

  • The Moral Machine Experiment on Large Language Models

    The Moral Machine Experiment on Large Language Models

  • Responsible AI Licenses: social vehicles toward decentralized control of AI

    Responsible AI Licenses: social vehicles toward decentralized control of AI

  • The importance of audit in AI governance

    The importance of audit in AI governance

  • Down the Toxicity Rabbit Hole: Investigating PaLM 2 Guardrails

    Down the Toxicity Rabbit Hole: Investigating PaLM 2 Guardrails

Partners

  • Ā 
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer


Articles

Columns

AI Literacy

The State of AI Ethics Report


 

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.

Contact

Donate


  • Ā© 2025 MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.