• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

  • Articles
    • Public Policy
    • Privacy & Security
    • Human Rights
      • Ethics
      • JEDI (Justice, Equity, Diversity, Inclusion
    • Climate
    • Design
      • Emerging Technology
    • Application & Adoption
      • Health
      • Education
      • Government
        • Military
        • Public Works
      • Labour
    • Arts & Culture
      • Film & TV
      • Music
      • Pop Culture
      • Digital Art
  • Columns
    • AI Policy Corner
    • Recess
  • The AI Ethics Brief
  • AI Literacy
    • Research Summaries
    • AI Ethics Living Dictionary
    • Learning Community
  • The State of AI Ethics Report
    • Volume 7 (November 2025)
    • Volume 6 (February 2022)
    • Volume 5 (July 2021)
    • Volume 4 (April 2021)
    • Volume 3 (Jan 2021)
    • Volume 2 (Oct 2020)
    • Volume 1 (June 2020)
  • About
    • Our Contributions Policy
    • Our Open Access Policy
    • Contact
    • Donate

Towards an Understanding of Developers’ Perceptions of Transparency in Software Development: A Preliminary Study

December 3, 2023

🔬 Research Summary by Humphrey O. Obie, an Adjunct Research Fellow with the HumaniSE Lab at Monash University; his research is at the intersection of human values and software and AI systems.

[Original paper by Humphrey O. Obie, Juliet Ukwella, Kashumi Madampe, John Grundy, and Mojtaba Shahin]


Overview: This paper delves into the perceptions and experiences of developers concerning the value of transparency in software development. Through interviews with experienced developers, the research shows the significance of transparency as a cornerstone in software development, emphasizing its role in fostering trust, accountability, and ethical practice.


Introduction

In today’s digital world, software applications have become integral to our daily lives, influencing everything from communication to healthcare. However, as these applications grow in influence, how much do we truly understand the values embedded within them and the violations of these values? This research seeks to understand developer’s perspectives on one such value: transparency. Transparency is an attribute of communication in software development that enables stakeholders to answer their questions about the software system during its software life cycle. Transparency also encompasses openness, clarity, and visibility of software applications’ inner workings, processes, and actions. Transparent software applications give users insight into how their data is collected, used, and protected. They enable users to understand the algorithms and decision-making processes behind automated systems.

By interviewing five experienced developers, this preliminary study aimed to comprehend how these professionals perceive transparency, its potential violations, and their methods to rectify such breaches. The findings offer a glimpse into key aspects related to developers’ understanding of transparency, violations of this value of transparency, and the process of addressing such reported values-violations.

Key Insights

Transparency as a Core Value

All participants unanimously recognized transparency as a pivotal value in software development. They associated it with honesty and accountability, emphasizing its role in clear communication during the development process. For developers, transparency is about being open and keeping stakeholders informed about progress and potential issues.

Balancing Transparency with Practical and Ethical Considerations

While transparency is paramount, developers also highlighted the need to balance it with other practical and ethical considerations. For instance, certain aspects need to be concealed from clients due to changing project scopes. This shows the intricate balance developers maintain, ensuring transparency while also navigating various challenges.

Detecting and Addressing Violations

Developers have a systematic approach to handling transparency violations. They first identify the root cause and then develop corrective action plans, followed by collaborative problem-solving and rigorous testing. The study revealed that developers are not only aware of potential transparency violations but also have strategies in place to address them effectively.

Collaborative Problem-Solving

The research emphasizes the importance of collaboration in addressing transparency violations Developers believe that involving relevant stakeholders, such as team members or clients, leads to more effective problem-solving and resolution. This collaborative approach ensures that the implemented solutions are robust and address the core issues.

Testing and Verification

Once a solution is implemented, developers highlight the importance of testing and verification. They believe that rigorous testing ensures the effectiveness of the implemented solution, ensuring that the transparency violation is effectively addressed.

Between the lines

The findings of this study are important in the current technological landscape. They highlight the importance that developers place on transparency, suggesting a strong ethical foundation in software development practices. However, the study also reveals the challenges developers face in maintaining transparency, especially when other practical or ethical considerations come into play. While the study provides valuable insights, exploring how these perceptions of transparency vary across different demographics, cultures, and domains, with a bigger sample size of study participants would be interesting.

Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

🔍 SEARCH

Spotlight

This image shows a large white, traditional, old building. The top half of the building represents the humanities (which is symbolised by the embedded text from classic literature which is faintly shown ontop the building). The bottom section of the building is embossed with mathematical formulas to represent the sciences. The middle layer of the image is heavily pixelated. On the steps at the front of the building there is a group of scholars, wearing formal suits and tie attire, who are standing around at the enternace talking and some of them are sitting on the steps. There are two stone, statute-like hands that are stretching the building apart from the left side. In the forefront of the image, there are 8 students - which can only be seen from the back. Their graduation gowns have bright blue hoods and they all look as though they are walking towards the old building which is in the background at a distance. There are a mix of students in the foreground.

Tech Futures: Co-opting Research and Education

Agentic AI systems and algorithmic accountability: a new era of e-commerce

ALL IN Conference 2025: Four Key Takeaways from Montreal

Beyond Dependency: The Hidden Risk of Social Comparison in Chatbot Companionship

AI Policy Corner: Restriction vs. Regulation: Comparing State Approaches to AI Mental Health Legislation

related posts

  • Augmented Datasheets for Speech Datasets and Ethical Decision-Making

    Augmented Datasheets for Speech Datasets and Ethical Decision-Making

  • The MAIEI Learning Community Report (September 2021)

    The MAIEI Learning Community Report (September 2021)

  • Human-AI Collaboration in Decision-Making: Beyond Learning to Defer

    Human-AI Collaboration in Decision-Making: Beyond Learning to Defer

  • Press Release: Analysis of COVI, Mila’s Contact Tracing Application

    Press Release: Analysis of COVI, Mila’s Contact Tracing Application

  • The Ethics of AI in Finance

    The Ethics of AI in Finance

  • Aging with AI: Another Source of Bias?

    Aging with AI: Another Source of Bias?

  • The Ethics of Emotion in AI Systems (Research Summary)

    The Ethics of Emotion in AI Systems (Research Summary)

  • Applying the TAII Framework on Tesla Bot

    Applying the TAII Framework on Tesla Bot

  • Research summary: Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelli...

    Research summary: Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelli...

  • Real talk: What is Responsible AI?

    Real talk: What is Responsible AI?

Partners

  •  
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer


Articles

Columns

AI Literacy

The State of AI Ethics Report


 

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.

Contact

Donate


  • © 2025 MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.