• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

  • Articles
    • Public Policy
    • Privacy & Security
    • Human Rights
      • Ethics
      • JEDI (Justice, Equity, Diversity, Inclusion
    • Climate
    • Design
      • Emerging Technology
    • Application & Adoption
      • Health
      • Education
      • Government
        • Military
        • Public Works
      • Labour
    • Arts & Culture
      • Film & TV
      • Music
      • Pop Culture
      • Digital Art
  • Columns
    • AI Policy Corner
    • Recess
  • The AI Ethics Brief
  • AI Literacy
    • Research Summaries
    • AI Ethics Living Dictionary
    • Learning Community
  • The State of AI Ethics Report
    • Volume 7 (November 2025)
    • Volume 6 (February 2022)
    • Volume 5 (July 2021)
    • Volume 4 (April 2021)
    • Volume 3 (Jan 2021)
    • Volume 2 (Oct 2020)
    • Volume 1 (June 2020)
  • About
    • Our Contributions Policy
    • Our Open Access Policy
    • Contact
    • Donate

Press Release: Analysis of COVI, Mila’s Contact Tracing Application

June 11, 2020

The Montreal AI Ethics Institute Releases an Analysis of COVI, Mila’s Contact Tracing Application

The Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI), an international, non-profit research institute published its official response to the white paper released by Mila concerning its contact tracing application COVI, which was developed in response to the COVID-19 Contact Tracing Initiative launched by Public Health Ontario and the Canadian Ministry of Health. 

COVI was developed by Mila to help combat COVID-19 by informing individuals of their risk of being infected with the virus. Mila claims the application would empower citizens to make informed decisions about their movement and allow for a data-driven approach to public health policy, while also ensuring data is kept private from governments, companies, and individuals.  

However, Mila makes several claims in its recently published white paper about COVI that the MAIEI believed it needed to address directly, particularly as governments urgently search for strategies and tools to maintain, limit, and prevent the spread of COVID-19. In its analysis, the MAIEI response explores:  

  • The extent to which diversity has been considered in the design of the application
  • The assumptions surrounding users’ interaction with the application as well as its utility
  • The unanswered questions about transparency, accountability, and security regarding the application

MAIEI hopes that by addressing the issues outlined above, it will begin a meaningful, constructive dialogue about COVI, as well as other existing and forthcoming contact tracing applications. In order to stop the spread of COVID-19, these applications must not only be effective but also maintain the privacy and confidentiality of their users. Unfortunately, COVI as currently proposed is too vague regarding these issues. 

To learn more about MAIEI’s analysis of COVI, access the full article here. 

Follow MAIEI’s work on Facebook, Twitter, and Linkedin, as well as through our newsletter and at montrealethics.ai.

About the Montreal AI Ethics Institute

The Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international, non-profit research institute dedicated to defining humanity’s place in a world increasingly characterized and driven by algorithms. Founded by Abhishek Gupta and Renjie Butalid in 2017 and led by a team of experts in machine learning, philosophy, ethics, innovation, and more, the MAIEI creates tangible and applied technical and policy research in the ethical, safe, and inclusive development of AI. The Institute aims to build public competence and understanding of the societal impacts of AI and to equip and empower diverse stakeholders to actively engage in the shaping of technical and policy measures in the development and deployment of AI systems. Learn more here.

For interview requests, contact Mo Akif (Director of Communications) at [email protected]

Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

🔍 SEARCH

Spotlight

Agentic AI systems and algorithmic accountability: a new era of e-commerce

ALL IN Conference 2025: Four Key Takeaways from Montreal

Beyond Dependency: The Hidden Risk of Social Comparison in Chatbot Companionship

AI Policy Corner: Restriction vs. Regulation: Comparing State Approaches to AI Mental Health Legislation

Beyond Consultation: Building Inclusive AI Governance for Canada’s Democratic Future

related posts

  • Government AI Readiness 2021 Index

    Government AI Readiness 2021 Index

  • Research summary: Classical Ethics in A/IS

    Research summary: Classical Ethics in A/IS

  • Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of “Bias” in NLP (Research summary)

    Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of “Bias” in NLP (Research summary)

  • The Wrong Kind of AI? Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Labour Demand (Research Summary)

    The Wrong Kind of AI? Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Labour Demand (Research Summary)

  • Designing Fiduciary Artificial Intelligence

    Designing Fiduciary Artificial Intelligence

  • Humans are not Boltzmann Distributions: Challenges and Opportunities for Modelling Human Feedback an...

    Humans are not Boltzmann Distributions: Challenges and Opportunities for Modelling Human Feedback an...

  • Connecting the dots in trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI principles, ethics, and key requ...

    Connecting the dots in trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI principles, ethics, and key requ...

  • Research summary: Fairness in Clustering with Multiple Sensitive Attributes

    Research summary: Fairness in Clustering with Multiple Sensitive Attributes

  • AI Ethics in the Public, Private, and NGO Sectors: A Review of a Global Document Collection

    AI Ethics in the Public, Private, and NGO Sectors: A Review of a Global Document Collection

  • Moral consideration of nonhumans in the ethics of artificial intelligence

    Moral consideration of nonhumans in the ethics of artificial intelligence

Partners

  •  
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer


Articles

Columns

AI Literacy

The State of AI Ethics Report


 

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.

Contact

Donate


  • © 2025 MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.