• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

  • Articles
    • Public Policy
    • Privacy & Security
    • Human Rights
      • Ethics
      • JEDI (Justice, Equity, Diversity, Inclusion
    • Climate
    • Design
      • Emerging Technology
    • Application & Adoption
      • Health
      • Education
      • Government
        • Military
        • Public Works
      • Labour
    • Arts & Culture
      • Film & TV
      • Music
      • Pop Culture
      • Digital Art
  • Columns
    • AI Policy Corner
    • Recess
  • The AI Ethics Brief
  • AI Literacy
    • Research Summaries
    • AI Ethics Living Dictionary
    • Learning Community
  • The State of AI Ethics Report
    • Volume 6 (February 2022)
    • Volume 5 (July 2021)
    • Volume 4 (April 2021)
    • Volume 3 (Jan 2021)
    • Volume 2 (Oct 2020)
    • Volume 1 (June 2020)
  • About
    • Our Contributions Policy
    • Our Open Access Policy
    • Contact
    • Donate

Jack Clark Presenting the 2022 AI Index Report

May 15, 2022

šŸ”¬ Video summary by Connor Wright, our Partnerships Manager.

[Original video by Jack Clark]


Overview: Who currently leads the way in terms of AI hiring? Is investment in AI simply concentrated in the same companies? Jack Clark guides us through the Stanford HAI Index, presenting the highlights and diving deeper into its individual chapters.


Introduction

Currently, 1 in 5 Computer Science PhD students specialise in AI. With the index in its 5th year, the perception of AI has clearly changed. Industry takeover has slowly started to erode the trust citizens place in the technology, while the capabilities of the technology have only expanded. Consequently, it becomes increasingly harder to keep on top of AI developments as it gets more and more integrated into the economy. Navigating us through the index, Jack Clark presents the highlights of the findings before taking a deeper dive into the chapters themselves.

Key Insights

The key highlights are as follows:

  • Investment – there’s more money in AI now than ever before. For example, in 2013, between $1-2 billion was invested, with 2021 racking up $94 billion.
  • Collaboration – despite the tensions, the US and China are the leaders in cross-country AI collaborations.
  • Language models – they work. Yet, this means it can facilitate both positive and negative ends.
  • The rise of AI Ethics – people are studying AI ethics more. Industry is investing more into the study, meaning the domain no longer just considers intangible and uninteresting problems.
  • AI training is more efficient – thanks to today’s improved underlying compute, AI is cheaper to build. Training an AI model can cost you as little as $5.
  • More global legislation – there is more legal involvement in the space than in previous years. 

With the highlights as a backdrop, examining the chapters in more depth became the next move.

Chapter 1: Research and Development

According to the index, China is now leading the amount of AI publications published. However, quantity doesn’t mean quality, with the US leading in citations. Included in these citations is the steady rise in collaborations between academia and non-government, as well as academia and company collaborations.

Chapter 2: Technical Performance

AI has not gotten comfortable with complex language tasks, performing below the human baseline despite tremendous strides being made. Nevertheless, natural language processing has blown past the human baseline on the more straightforward tasks. Given this mastery, reinforcement learning takes on more complex tasks, becoming more competent at various activities. Consequently, the efficiency has allowed robotic arms to become cheaper.

Chapter 3: Technical AI Ethics

While language models have improved, they still suffer from the recurring problem of bias which cannot be solved on a technical basis alone. To quote Clark, ā€œethical challenges are not the same as technical challengesā€. The category of problems like bias requires a socio-techno attitude, especially when the problems are multimodal. Biases of this ilk are harder to deal with, showing how as AI’s capabilities have increased, so has the complexity of its problems.

Chapter 4: The Economy and Education

New Zealand, Hong Kong, and Ireland lead the way in terms of hiring. Given their relatively more minor economies than the AI giants China and the US, they can specialise their economy and become a talent pool. Within the US, Texas, New York, Virginia, and California have the highest number of AI-related jobs. The country is leading the way in terms of newly funded companies and private AI investment, whereby 1 in every 5 Computer Science PhD graduates specialises in AI or machine learning.

Practically all areas measured (bar Ed Tech) have increased in investment since 2020. However, while private investment has soared, so has its concentration. The same companies are receiving the lion’s share of investment, with ā€œdata management processing and cloudā€ acquiring the most AI private investment in 2021. Consequently, between 2010-and 2020, the majority of AI PhDs in the US went into industry.

Chapter 5: AI Policy and Governance

Bills containing ā€œAIā€ passed into law went from 1 in 2016 to 18 in 2021, serving as an indication of a rising interest in the legal space. The state level has proved the most successful breeding ground for passing AI legislation within the US context.

Between the lines

I agree with Clark that one of the most surprising statistics within the report was how many Computer Science PhD candidates specialised in industry within the US. For me, given how the talent and interest are there, intertwining the importance of at least considering ethics within computer science work becomes even more significant. With AI becoming a priority in academia, receiving the necessary funding and being deployed, a so-called AI ā€˜farm to fork’ narrative can now be drawn. We have a better idea of where it is being developed, who is undertaking the task and what potential incentives they could be acting upon (such as pressures from industry). Hence, while the AI space has matured and now produces working models, acting upon the positive incentives placed on this dual-use technology will prove crucial.

Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

šŸ” SEARCH

Spotlight

ALL IN Conference 2025: Four Key Takeaways from Montreal

Beyond Dependency: The Hidden Risk of Social Comparison in Chatbot Companionship

AI Policy Corner: Restriction vs. Regulation: Comparing State Approaches to AI Mental Health Legislation

Beyond Consultation: Building Inclusive AI Governance for Canada’s Democratic Future

AI Policy Corner: U.S. Executive Order on Advancing AI Education for American Youth

related posts

  • Social Robots and Empathy: The Harmful Effects of Always Getting What We Want

    Social Robots and Empathy: The Harmful Effects of Always Getting What We Want

  • Deployment corrections: An incident response framework for frontier AI models

    Deployment corrections: An incident response framework for frontier AI models

  • Resistance and refusal to algorithmic harms: Varieties of ā€˜knowledge projects’

    Resistance and refusal to algorithmic harms: Varieties of ā€˜knowledge projects’

  • A Generalist Agent

    A Generalist Agent

  • Summoning a New Artificial Intelligence Patent Model: In the Age of Pandemic

    Summoning a New Artificial Intelligence Patent Model: In the Age of Pandemic

  • Towards Responsible AI in the Era of ChatGPT: A Reference Architecture for Designing Foundation Mode...

    Towards Responsible AI in the Era of ChatGPT: A Reference Architecture for Designing Foundation Mode...

  • Deciphering Open Source in the EU AI Act

    Deciphering Open Source in the EU AI Act

  • On the Generation of Unsafe Images and Hateful Memes From Text-To-Image Models

    On the Generation of Unsafe Images and Hateful Memes From Text-To-Image Models

  • Survey of EU Ethical Guidelines for Commercial AI: Case Studies in Financial Services

    Survey of EU Ethical Guidelines for Commercial AI: Case Studies in Financial Services

  • AI in the Gray: Exploring Moderation Policies in Dialogic Large Language Models vs. Human Answers in...

    AI in the Gray: Exploring Moderation Policies in Dialogic Large Language Models vs. Human Answers in...

Partners

  • Ā 
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer


Articles

Columns

AI Literacy

The State of AI Ethics Report


 

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.

Contact

Donate


  • Ā© 2025 MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.