• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

  • Articles
    • Public Policy
    • Privacy & Security
    • Human Rights
      • Ethics
      • JEDI (Justice, Equity, Diversity, Inclusion
    • Climate
    • Design
      • Emerging Technology
    • Application & Adoption
      • Health
      • Education
      • Government
        • Military
        • Public Works
      • Labour
    • Arts & Culture
      • Film & TV
      • Music
      • Pop Culture
      • Digital Art
  • Columns
    • AI Policy Corner
    • Recess
    • Tech Futures
  • The AI Ethics Brief
  • AI Literacy
    • Research Summaries
    • AI Ethics Living Dictionary
    • Learning Community
  • The State of AI Ethics Report
    • Volume 7 (November 2025)
    • Volume 6 (February 2022)
    • Volume 5 (July 2021)
    • Volume 4 (April 2021)
    • Volume 3 (Jan 2021)
    • Volume 2 (Oct 2020)
    • Volume 1 (June 2020)
  • About
    • Our Contributions Policy
    • Our Open Access Policy
    • Contact
    • Donate

GenAI Against Humanity: Nefarious Applications of Generative Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models

December 6, 2023

🔬 Research Summary by Emilio Ferrara, a professor at the Thomas Lord Department of Computer Science of the University of Southern California.

[Original paper by Emilio Ferrara]


Overview: This paper delves into the dual nature of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs), highlighting their potential for both groundbreaking advancements and malicious misuse. By examining various applications, the viewpoint underscores these technologies’ ethical and societal challenges, emphasizing the need for responsible deployment.


Introduction

In 2019, a UK-based energy company was deceived by a synthetic voice impersonating the parent firm’s CEO, requesting a money transfer, leading to a significant financial loss. This incident, while alarming, is a mere glimpse into the vast implications of GenAI and LLMs. My research aims to explore the myriad ways in which these technologies can be harnessed for both beneficial and nefarious purposes. Through a deep dive into various applications, the paper seeks to answer the following questions: How can GenAI and LLMs reshape society, and what are the potential risks associated with their misuse?

Key Insights

GenAI’s Transformative Potential

Generative AI has shown promise across various sectors, from restoring historical artifacts to enhancing personalized content generation. Its ability to generate content, simulate voices, and even recreate experiences has opened up a plethora of opportunities, promising innovations that could redefine industries.

The Dark Side of GenAI

However, the same capabilities that make GenAI revolutionary also make it susceptible to misuse. My research highlights concerns related to targeted surveillance, where enhanced capabilities can lead to invasive monitoring. While essential for removing harmful content, content moderation can be weaponized for extreme censorship. Adversarial attacks, powered by GenAI, can deceive even experts, leading to potential security breaches. Furthermore, the ability to manipulate public sentiment can have cascading effects on socio-technical systems, from influencing stock markets to swaying election outcomes.

Planetary Implications

The paper emphasizes the planetary implications of GenAI, especially when deployed at scale. Its influence extends beyond technological advancements, impacting socio-technical systems, including the economy, democracy, and infrastructure.

Between the lines

The findings of this research are both enlightening and alarming. While GenAI and LLMs hold immense potential, their unchecked proliferation can lead to unprecedented challenges. The paper serves as a timely reminder of the ethical considerations that must accompany technological advancements. One gap in the research is the exploration of potential mitigation strategies to address the highlighted concerns. Future research could delve deeper into developing robust defense mechanisms and ethical guidelines to ensure the responsible deployment of GenAI and LLMs.

Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

🔍 SEARCH

Spotlight

A network diagram with lots of little emojis, organised in clusters.

Tech Futures: AI For and Against Knowledge

A brightly coloured illustration which can be viewed in any direction. It has many elements to it working together: men in suits around a table, someone in a data centre, big hands controlling the scenes and holding a phone, people in a production line. Motifs such as network diagrams and melting emojis are placed throughout the busy vignettes.

Tech Futures: The Fossil Fuels Playbook for Big Tech: Part II

A rock embedded with intricate circuit board patterns, held delicately by pale hands drawn in a ghostly style. The contrast between the rough, metallic mineral and the sleek, artificial circuit board illustrates the relationship between raw natural resources and modern technological development. The hands evoke human involvement in the extraction and manufacturing processes.

Tech Futures: The Fossil Fuels Playbook for Big Tech: Part I

Close-up of a cat sleeping on a computer keyboard

Tech Futures: The threat of AI-generated code to the world’s digital infrastructure

The undying sun hangs in the sky, as people gather around signal towers, working through their digital devices.

Dreams and Realities in Modi’s AI Impact Summit

related posts

  • Ghosting the Machine: Judicial Resistance to a Recidivism Risk Assessment Instrument

    Ghosting the Machine: Judicial Resistance to a Recidivism Risk Assessment Instrument

  • Listen to What They Say: Better Understand and Detect Online Misinformation with User Feedback

    Listen to What They Say: Better Understand and Detect Online Misinformation with User Feedback

  • Enough With “Human-AI Collaboration”

    Enough With “Human-AI Collaboration”

  • Toward an Ethics of AI Belief

    Toward an Ethics of AI Belief

  • FaiRIR: Mitigating Exposure Bias from Related Item Recommendations in Two-Sided Platforms

    FaiRIR: Mitigating Exposure Bias from Related Item Recommendations in Two-Sided Platforms

  • Broadening AI Ethics Narratives: An Indic Art View

    Broadening AI Ethics Narratives: An Indic Art View

  • Incentivized Symbiosis: A Paradigm for Human-Agent Coevolution

    Incentivized Symbiosis: A Paradigm for Human-Agent Coevolution

  • The Ethical AI Startup Ecosystem 02: Data for AI

    The Ethical AI Startup Ecosystem 02: Data for AI

  • Should you make your decisions on a WhIM? Data-driven decision-making using a What-If Machine for Ev...

    Should you make your decisions on a WhIM? Data-driven decision-making using a What-If Machine for Ev...

  • Research summary: Working Algorithms: Software Automation and the Future of Work

    Research summary: Working Algorithms: Software Automation and the Future of Work

Partners

  •  
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer


Articles

Columns

AI Literacy

The State of AI Ethics Report


 

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.

Contact

Donate


  • © 2025 MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.