• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Core Principles of Responsible AI
    • Accountability
    • Fairness
    • Privacy
    • Safety and Security
    • Sustainability
    • Transparency
  • Special Topics
    • AI in Industry
    • Ethical Implications
    • Human-Centered Design
    • Regulatory Landscape
    • Technical Methods
  • Living Dictionary
  • State of AI Ethics
  • AI Ethics Brief
  • 🇫🇷
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

Corporate Governance of Artificial Intelligence in the Public Interest

August 10, 2021

🔬 Research summary by Jonas Schuett, Policy Research Intern at DeepMind | Research Fellow at the Legal Priorities Project | PhD Candidate in Law at Goethe University Frankfurt

[Original paper by Peter Cihon, Jonas Schuett, Seth D. Baum]


Overview:

How can different actors improve the corporate governance of AI in the public interest? This paper offers a broad introduction to the topic. It surveys opportunities of nine types of actors inside and outside the corporation. In many cases, the best results will accrue when multiple types of actors work together.


Introduction

Private industry is at the forefront of AI research and development. AI is a major focus of the technology industry, which includes some of the largest corporations in the world. As AI research and development has an increasingly outsized impact on the world, it is essential to ensure that the governance of the field’s leading companies supports the public interest.

Key Insights

Opportunities to improve the corporate governance of AI

The opportunities to improve AI corporate governance are diverse. The paper surveys opportunities for nine different types of actors:

  • Management can establish policies, translate policies into practice, and create structures such as oversight committees.
  • Workers can directly affect the design and use of AI systems, and can have indirect effects by influencing management.
  • Investors can voice concerns to management, vote in shareholder resolutions, replace a corporation’s board of directors, sell off their investments to signal disapproval, and file lawsuits against the corporation.
  • Corporate partners can use their business-to-business market power and relations to influence companies, while corporate competitors can push each other in pursuit of market share and reputation.
  • Industry consortia can identify and promote best practices, formalize best practices as standards, and pool resources to advance industry interests, such as by lobbying governments.
  • Nonprofit organizations can conduct research, advocate for change, organize coalitions, and raise awareness.
  • The public can select which corporate AI products and services to use, and also support specific AI public policies.
  • The media can research, document, analyze, and generate attention to corporate governance activities and related matters.

Coordination and collaboration

In many cases, the best results will accrue when multiple types of actors work together. The paper shows this via extended discussion of three running examples:

  • First, workers and the media collaborated to influence managers at Google to leave Project Maven, a drone video classification project of the US Department of Defense. Workers initially leaked information about Maven to the media, and then signed an open letter against Maven following media reports.
  • Second, nonprofit research and advocacy on law enforcement use of facial recognition technology fueled worker and investor activism and public pressure (especially the 2020 protests against racism and police brutality) that ultimately pushed multiple competing AI corporations to change their practices.
  • Third, workers, management, and industry consortia have interacted to develop and promote best practices concerning the publication of potentially harmful research.

Between the lines

The paper will be of use to researchers looking for an overview of corporate governance at leading AI companies, levers of influence in corporate AI development, and opportunities to improve corporate governance with an eye towards long-term AI development.

Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

🔍 SEARCH

Spotlight

AI Policy Corner: The Kenya National AI Strategy

AI Policy Corner: New York City Local Law 144

Canada’s Minister of AI and Digital Innovation is a Historic First. Here’s What We Recommend.

Am I Literate? Redefining Literacy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

AI Policy Corner: The Texas Responsible AI Governance Act

related posts

  • Disability, Bias, and AI (Research Summary)

    Disability, Bias, and AI (Research Summary)

  • Research summary:  Learning to Complement Humans

    Research summary: Learning to Complement Humans

  • Analysis of the “Artificial Intelligence governance principles: towards ethical and trustworthy arti...

    Analysis of the “Artificial Intelligence governance principles: towards ethical and trustworthy arti...

  • Mapping the Ethics of Generative AI: A Comprehensive Scoping Review

    Mapping the Ethics of Generative AI: A Comprehensive Scoping Review

  • AI and Great Power Competition: Implications for National Security

    AI and Great Power Competition: Implications for National Security

  • Operationalising the Definition of General Purpose AI Systems: Assessing Four Approaches

    Operationalising the Definition of General Purpose AI Systems: Assessing Four Approaches

  • Unprofessional Peer Reviews Disproportionately Harm Underrepresented Groups in STEM (Research Summar...

    Unprofessional Peer Reviews Disproportionately Harm Underrepresented Groups in STEM (Research Summar...

  • Ethics for People Who Work in Tech

    Ethics for People Who Work in Tech

  • Breaking Your Neural Network with Adversarial Examples

    Breaking Your Neural Network with Adversarial Examples

  • Responsible Design Patterns for Machine Learning Pipelines

    Responsible Design Patterns for Machine Learning Pipelines

Partners

  •  
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer

Categories


• Blog
• Research Summaries
• Columns
• Core Principles of Responsible AI
• Special Topics

Signature Content


• The State Of AI Ethics

• The Living Dictionary

• The AI Ethics Brief

Learn More


• About

• Open Access Policy

• Contributions Policy

• Editorial Stance on AI Tools

• Press

• Donate

• Contact

The AI Ethics Brief (bi-weekly newsletter)

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.


Archive

  • © MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE. All rights reserved 2024.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.