• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

  • Articles
    • Public Policy
    • Privacy & Security
    • Human Rights
      • Ethics
      • JEDI (Justice, Equity, Diversity, Inclusion
    • Climate
    • Design
      • Emerging Technology
    • Application & Adoption
      • Health
      • Education
      • Government
        • Military
        • Public Works
      • Labour
    • Arts & Culture
      • Film & TV
      • Music
      • Pop Culture
      • Digital Art
  • Columns
    • AI Policy Corner
    • Recess
    • Tech Futures
  • The AI Ethics Brief
  • AI Literacy
    • Research Summaries
    • AI Ethics Living Dictionary
    • Learning Community
  • The State of AI Ethics Report
    • Volume 7 (November 2025)
    • Volume 6 (February 2022)
    • Volume 5 (July 2021)
    • Volume 4 (April 2021)
    • Volume 3 (Jan 2021)
    • Volume 2 (Oct 2020)
    • Volume 1 (June 2020)
  • About
    • Our Contributions Policy
    • Our Open Access Policy
    • Contact
    • Donate

AI Policy Corner: Singapore’s National AI Strategy 2.0

May 12, 2025

✍️ By Evan Glenn.

Evan is an Undergraduate Student in Political Science and a Research Assistant at the Governance and Responsible AI Lab (GRAIL), Purdue University.


📌 Editor’s Note: This article is part of our AI Policy Corner series, a collaboration between the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) and the Governance and Responsible AI Lab (GRAIL) at Purdue University. The series provides concise insights into critical AI policy developments from the local to international levels, helping our readers stay informed about the evolving landscape of AI governance.


Singapore’s National AI Strategy 2.0

The Singapore National AI Strategy 2.0, released in late 2023, outlines a policy framework intended to “harness AI for the Public Good, for Singapore and the World”.

The plan is divided into three Systems, each containing Enablers with assigned Actions to carry out this goal. 

System One: Activity Drivers

This system relies on Industry, Government, and Research to set the foundation for AI integration and advancement. The Government is the lynchpin of Singapore’s plans, with many of its Actions hinging on public funding and incentives (e.g. for training programs and the development of AI Centers of Excellence). In particular, Singapore is interested in convening AI talent and Industry builders from Singapore and beyond. The Government is also committed to expanding resources and policy guidelines to enhance its Research output.

System Two: People & Communities

This system relies on Talent, Capabilities, and Placemaking to foster the human resources for AI R&D. It reaffirms commitments to introducing training programs and attracting talent. Specifically, Singapore seeks to enable industry and academic exchanges as well as develop an “iconic AI site” to “serve as an intellectual home”. Additionally, Singapore wants to directly encourage industry to explore AI Capabilities, including their own suggestions for AI solutions in its Industry Digital Plans.

System Three: Infrastructure & Environment

This system cites Compute, Data, a Trusted Environment, and a Leader in Thought and Action as the support structure for AI. The Government commits to expanding Compute and Data for use in R&D, while remaining mindful of environmental and privacy risks. For example, the government will create a “data concierge” to control access to public sector datasets. The government also seeks to manage risks through an adaptable, tiered regulatory framework. Finally, Singapore recognizes that AI use has global implications and wants to approach risk management with a mindset of international cooperation.

Developments

Before the release of the NAIS 2.0, Singapore was well on the way to fulfilling some of its outlined actions, such as authorizing the use of the Pair LLM by government officers. Many of the actions were also officially announced in early 2024 at the Committee of Supply Debates. This includes investments for compute resources, scholarships/internships, and an overall investment of “more than $1 billion over the next five years” to support NAIS 2.0. Additionally, guidelines on the use of personal data were published following this event.

More recently, at the February 2025 AI Action Summit in Paris (see The AI Ethics Brief #158 for details), Singapore announced several AI initiatives to address safety risks including a “testbed for best practices around technical testing of GenAI applications” and a report on Singapore’s AI Safety Red Teaming Challenge setting out widely applicable testing methodologies.

Notably, Singapore also announced a collaborative Joint Testing Report with Japan, following through on the collaborative ideals set out in the NAIS 2.0. While the NAIS 2.0 largely relies on general language, Singapore appears to be holding itself to its goals.

Further Reading

  1. The Smart Nation Initiative
  2. The Pair LLM
  3. Singapore’s AI Safety Institute

Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

🔍 SEARCH

Spotlight

Close-up of a cat sleeping on a computer keyboard

Tech Futures: The threat of AI-generated code to the world’s digital infrastructure

The undying sun hangs in the sky, as people gather around signal towers, working through their digital devices.

Dreams and Realities in Modi’s AI Impact Summit

Illustration of a coral reef ecosystem

Tech Futures: Diversity of Thought and Experience: The UN’s Scientific Panel on AI

This image shows a large white, traditional, old building. The top half of the building represents the humanities (which is symbolised by the embedded text from classic literature which is faintly shown ontop the building). The bottom section of the building is embossed with mathematical formulas to represent the sciences. The middle layer of the image is heavily pixelated. On the steps at the front of the building there is a group of scholars, wearing formal suits and tie attire, who are standing around at the enternace talking and some of them are sitting on the steps. There are two stone, statute-like hands that are stretching the building apart from the left side. In the forefront of the image, there are 8 students - which can only be seen from the back. Their graduation gowns have bright blue hoods and they all look as though they are walking towards the old building which is in the background at a distance. There are a mix of students in the foreground.

Tech Futures: Co-opting Research and Education

Agentic AI systems and algorithmic accountability: a new era of e-commerce

related posts

  • AI Policy Corner: The Kenya National AI Strategy

    AI Policy Corner: The Kenya National AI Strategy

  • Recess: Your wrist, your data, their access: Are you trading convenience for control?

    Recess: Your wrist, your data, their access: Are you trading convenience for control?

  • The Paris AI Summit: Deregulation, Fear, and Surveillance

    The Paris AI Summit: Deregulation, Fear, and Surveillance

  • Canada’s Minister of AI and Digital Innovation is a Historic First. Here’s What We Recommend.

    Canada’s Minister of AI and Digital Innovation is a Historic First. Here’s What We Recommend.

  • The Death of Canada’s Artificial Intelligence and Data Act: What Happened, and What’s Next for AI Re...

    The Death of Canada’s Artificial Intelligence and Data Act: What Happened, and What’s Next for AI Re...

  • AI Policy Corner: Automating Licensed Professions: Assessing Health Technology and Other Industries

    AI Policy Corner: Automating Licensed Professions: Assessing Health Technology and Other Industries

  • AI Governance on the Ground: Canada’s Algorithmic Impact Assessment Process and Algorithm has evolve...

    AI Governance on the Ground: Canada’s Algorithmic Impact Assessment Process and Algorithm has evolve...

  • Bridging the Gap: Addressing the Legislative Gap Surrounding Non-Consensual Deepfakes

    Bridging the Gap: Addressing the Legislative Gap Surrounding Non-Consensual Deepfakes

  • AI Policy Corner: Texas and New York: Comparing U.S. State-Level AI Laws

    AI Policy Corner: Texas and New York: Comparing U.S. State-Level AI Laws

  • Social Context of LLMs - the BigScience Approach, Part 4:Model Governance and Responsible Use

    Social Context of LLMs - the BigScience Approach, Part 4:Model Governance and Responsible Use

Partners

  •  
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer


Articles

Columns

AI Literacy

The State of AI Ethics Report


 

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.

Contact

Donate


  • © 2025 MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.