• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

  • Articles
    • Public Policy
    • Privacy & Security
    • Human Rights
      • Ethics
      • JEDI (Justice, Equity, Diversity, Inclusion
    • Climate
    • Design
      • Emerging Technology
    • Application & Adoption
      • Health
      • Education
      • Government
        • Military
        • Public Works
      • Labour
    • Arts & Culture
      • Film & TV
      • Music
      • Pop Culture
      • Digital Art
  • Columns
    • AI Policy Corner
    • Recess
  • The AI Ethics Brief
  • AI Literacy
    • Research Summaries
    • AI Ethics Living Dictionary
    • Learning Community
  • The State of AI Ethics Report
    • Volume 7 (November 2025)
    • Volume 6 (February 2022)
    • Volume 5 (July 2021)
    • Volume 4 (April 2021)
    • Volume 3 (Jan 2021)
    • Volume 2 (Oct 2020)
    • Volume 1 (June 2020)
  • About
    • Our Contributions Policy
    • Our Open Access Policy
    • Contact
    • Donate

The Canada Protocol: AI checklist for Mental Health & Suicide Prevention

May 1, 2019

Read the Canada Protocol: AI checklist for Mental Health & Suicide Prevention. Download


The Canada Protocol is an open-access project for Artificial Intelligence and Big Data developers, decision-makers, professionals, researchers, and anyone thinking about using AI. It was created by Carl Mörch and Ahbishek Gupta in Montreal, Canada.

It started as a part of Carl Mörch’s Ph.D. The Mental Health version was scientifically supervised by Brian L. Mishara, his Ph.D. supervisor.

AI is a source of immense hopes and valid concerns. It’s challenging to know how to remain ethical when using AI. That’s why we started the Canada Protocol. We have synthesized and analyzed over 40 reports, professional guidelines, and key studies on AI & Ethics. Our intention is to gather all of the existing scientific and validated recommendations on how to address AI’s ethical risks and challenges. We hope this project can help you!

The Mental Health and Suicide Prevention checklist focuses on the very specific challenges of using AI in the context of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention.

We created a checklist to review the key potential ethical questions. It was validated in 2018 by 16 experts and professionals with a two-round Delphi consultation.

Why Mental Health & AI?

Mental Health has been transformed by the rise of AI and Big Data (Luxton, 2014). Professionals, researchers and companies increasingly use AI to detect at-risk individuals and depressed users, study emotions, increase motivation, improve public health strategies and the list goes on. But as promising as it might be, AI raises many complex ethical challenges, such as the difficulty of obtaining consent or the risk of divulging private information.

The Development

We synthesized and analyzed over 40 reports, professional guidelines, and key studies on AI & Ethics. We have collected over 300 mentions of challenges. We deduplicated the items and selected the most relevant to Mental Health & Suicide Prevention. We then invited international experts, AI developers, researchers specialized in ethics, ICT and Health to provide feedback using the Delphi Method, a method commonly used in Healthcare to gather expert opinions and reach a consensus on specific topics.

Why a checklist?

Checklists are frequently used in health care. They can be used for a wide range of reasons: to help clinicians diagnosing, to make sure a research methodology has been well implemented, or to improve public health strategies. They can be very useful by summarizing key recommendations and best practices.

How does it work?

This version of the Canada Protocol is a checklist. It invites you to review 38 key ethical questions when AI is used in the context of Mental Health Care or Suicide Prevention. The user is asked to read each item and thus review your practices and how your Autonomous Intelligent System (IEEE, 2016) works.

Who are the people that developed it?

Abhishek Gupta is the founder of the Montreal AI Ethics Institute and an AI Ethics researcher working on creating ethical, safe and inclusive AI systems. He also works as a Software Engineer doing machine learning at Microsoft in Montreal where he sits on the AI Ethics Review Board for Commercial Software Engineering.

Carl Mörch is a French psychologist and lecturer at Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), Canada. He holds a M.Psy. from the Ecole de Psychologues Praticiens and is specialized in the use of Information and Communication Technologies in Psychology. He is currently finishing a Ph.D. at UQAM on the use of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Suicide Prevention. He also works with the Epione Lab at UQAM on the use of text-messaging to improve universal prevention strategies.

Camille Vézy is a PhD student in communication studies at the University of Montreal. She was involved in the coconstruction process of the Montreal Declaration for Responsible AI where she animated focus groups about the ethical impacts of AI in education, analyzed the collected data for the final report and conducted research about digital literacy. She is also chair of TechnoCultureClub’s board of directors, a non-profit organization that fosters active community participation in culture by supporting the development of new practices and uses of technology.

Brian Mishara is the Founder of the Centre for Research and Intervention on Suicide, Ethical Issues and End-of-Life Practices (CRISE). He has been director of the CRISE since 1996. He is a Professor in the Psychology Department at the University of Quebec since 1979. Internationally renowned researcher in the field of Suicidology, Brian Mishara was a co-founder of the Quebec Association for Suicide Prevention, was President of the Canadian Association for Suicide Prevention (CASP) and was President of the International Association for Suicide Prevention (IASP) from 2005 to 2009. He has authored a book on New Technologies in Suicide Prevention in 2013.


Read through The Canada Protocol here.

Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

🔍 SEARCH

Spotlight

This image shows a large white, traditional, old building. The top half of the building represents the humanities (which is symbolised by the embedded text from classic literature which is faintly shown ontop the building). The bottom section of the building is embossed with mathematical formulas to represent the sciences. The middle layer of the image is heavily pixelated. On the steps at the front of the building there is a group of scholars, wearing formal suits and tie attire, who are standing around at the enternace talking and some of them are sitting on the steps. There are two stone, statute-like hands that are stretching the building apart from the left side. In the forefront of the image, there are 8 students - which can only be seen from the back. Their graduation gowns have bright blue hoods and they all look as though they are walking towards the old building which is in the background at a distance. There are a mix of students in the foreground.

Tech Futures: Co-opting Research and Education

Agentic AI systems and algorithmic accountability: a new era of e-commerce

ALL IN Conference 2025: Four Key Takeaways from Montreal

Beyond Dependency: The Hidden Risk of Social Comparison in Chatbot Companionship

AI Policy Corner: Restriction vs. Regulation: Comparing State Approaches to AI Mental Health Legislation

related posts

  • Artificial Intelligence and Healthcare: From Sci-Fi to Reality

    Artificial Intelligence and Healthcare: From Sci-Fi to Reality

  • Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey

    Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey

  • Artificial Intelligence in healthcare: providing ease or ethical dilemmas?

    Artificial Intelligence in healthcare: providing ease or ethical dilemmas?

  • Confidence-Building Measures for Artificial Intelligence

    Confidence-Building Measures for Artificial Intelligence

  • Disability, Bias, and AI (Research Summary)

    Disability, Bias, and AI (Research Summary)

  • The MAIEI Learning Community Report (September 2021)

    The MAIEI Learning Community Report (September 2021)

  • Technical methods for regulatory inspection of algorithmic systems in social media platforms

    Technical methods for regulatory inspection of algorithmic systems in social media platforms

  • Research Summary: Trust and Transparency in Contact Tracing Applications

    Research Summary: Trust and Transparency in Contact Tracing Applications

  • In Consideration of Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Data Mining as a Colonial Practice

    In Consideration of Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Data Mining as a Colonial Practice

  • A Look at the American Data Privacy and Protection Act

    A Look at the American Data Privacy and Protection Act

Partners

  •  
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer


Articles

Columns

AI Literacy

The State of AI Ethics Report


 

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.

Contact

Donate


  • © 2025 MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.