• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Core Principles of Responsible AI
    • Accountability
    • Fairness
    • Privacy
    • Safety and Security
    • Sustainability
    • Transparency
  • Special Topics
    • AI in Industry
    • Ethical Implications
    • Human-Centered Design
    • Regulatory Landscape
    • Technical Methods
  • Living Dictionary
  • State of AI Ethics
  • AI Ethics Brief
  • 🇫🇷
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

South Korea as a Fourth Industrial Revolution Middle Power?

March 30, 2022

🔬 Research summary by Connor Wright, our Partnerships Manager.

[Original paper by Dongwoo Kim]


Overview: As a self-identified middle power, South Korea’s adequacy for the label is assessed within the context of the fourth industrial revolution. While the country bears the qualities to adopt the title, doing so does not come without its own baggage.


Introduction

What is a middle power? What purpose do they serve? Within this paper, South Korea is evaluated on its self-proclaimed middle power status in the fourth industrial revolution (4IR). Here, a middle power possesses the interest and capacity to work with fellow similar-sized states to strengthen governance. Consequently, their role in governance and how this is looks within the 4IR scene is examined. South Korea’s adequacy for being classed as a middle power is subsequently observed through three criteria, where I then note the challenges associated with such a position. Nevertheless, to begin with, what is their role in governance?

Key Insights

The role of middle powers in governance

Within the governmental sphere, middle powers assume the role of “policy entrepreneurs” (p. 2), starting initiatives in response to global events (such as combating climate change). Through creating such initiatives, middle powers play the role of mediators between the more considerable opposed powers (such as the US and China) to foster the acceptance of such policies. Consequently, middle powers coordinate attitudes of cohesion between these powers, establishing groups of like-minded entities through their mediation and policy efforts. The fourth industrial revolution (4IR) proves a beneficial use case to view such play in action.

The 4IR

An essential part of the 4IR is the increase in connectedness between systems. Consequently, more data is being produced and recorded, making them harder to track, govern and monitor. Moreover, the diminishing control of a nation’s sovereignty accompanies this lack of control. States are pressured to provide environments conducive to such change but are also expected to keep up with regulating the space, which is not always possible.

Subsequently, middle powers can prove a helpful sandbox to how such data policy can look. However, what does it take for a country to be classed as a middle power? In answer to this question, the author proposes three necessary (but not sufficient) and independent criteria to assess whether South Korea would make the cut.

South Korea and becoming a middle power: three criteria

Technology

Middle powers must possess expertise and capacity in current technology for a state to constructively contribute to the technology space. Given South Korea’s technological history and emergence as a technological hub, the country resolutely fulfils this criterion.

Networks

Becoming a middle power is not just about knowing individuals. Instead, their role is to rally like-minded nations and non-state actors (such as in research and industry) to mobilise coordination. Concerning South Korea, its sustained good relationships with both Washington and Beijing, while also bearing strong links with non-state actors, fulfils the criteria yet again.

Governance

The 4IR entails a systemic change that needs to be monitored appropriately by regulation. South Korea’s whole-nation approach to governance allows for strong attention to administrative tasks and building relationships to influence the 4IR effects. Hence, the country passes the third and final test.

In sum, South Korea’s self-proclaimed middle power status is vindicated. Nevertheless, acting as a middle person is not always easy.

Challenges

Through its ties to both Washington and Beijing, South Korea does lose sovereignty over policy to maintain good relations with both sides. A consequence of maintaining these relations could be a focus on the economic side of technology, with the US wanting to sure up its defence against Chinese tech domination. Yet, if economic values are prioritised, then the South Korean Government may receive backlash for not addressing the social issues at hand. As a result, the task of serving as a middle power becomes a balancing act.

Between the lines

South Korea certainly seems to fit the bill for its middle power status. While this allows the country to be a policy initiator and maintain relations in both the West and the East, doing so does come with its own baggage. South Korea’s transition to a developed economy is a fantastic feat. Yet, perhaps a question could still be asked about whether the country would achieve more or less if they were to abandon this position? One thing’s for sure, the 4IR is upon us, and it will give us an answer.

Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

🔍 SEARCH

Spotlight

Canada’s Minister of AI and Digital Innovation is a Historic First. Here’s What We Recommend.

Am I Literate? Redefining Literacy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

AI Policy Corner: The Texas Responsible AI Governance Act

AI Policy Corner: Singapore’s National AI Strategy 2.0

AI Governance in a Competitive World: Balancing Innovation, Regulation and Ethics | Point Zero Forum 2025

related posts

  • Mind your Language (Model): Fact-Checking LLMs and their Role in NLP Research and Practice

    Mind your Language (Model): Fact-Checking LLMs and their Role in NLP Research and Practice

  • The Challenge of Understanding What Users Want: Inconsistent Preferences and Engagement Optimization

    The Challenge of Understanding What Users Want: Inconsistent Preferences and Engagement Optimization

  • Demographic-Reliant Algorithmic Fairness: Characterizing the Risks of Demographic Data Collection an...

    Demographic-Reliant Algorithmic Fairness: Characterizing the Risks of Demographic Data Collection an...

  • Research summary: SoK: Security and Privacy in Machine Learning

    Research summary: SoK: Security and Privacy in Machine Learning

  • Fairness Uncertainty Quantification: How certain are you that the model is fair?

    Fairness Uncertainty Quantification: How certain are you that the model is fair?

  • The Role of Relevance in Fair Ranking

    The Role of Relevance in Fair Ranking

  • Algorithmic accountability for the public sector

    Algorithmic accountability for the public sector

  • Responsible Generative AI: A Reference Architecture for Designing Foundation Model-based Agents

    Responsible Generative AI: A Reference Architecture for Designing Foundation Model-based Agents

  • Towards User-Guided Actionable Recourse

    Towards User-Guided Actionable Recourse

  • Not Quite ‘Ask a Librarian’: AI on the Nature, Value, and Future of LIS

    Not Quite ‘Ask a Librarian’: AI on the Nature, Value, and Future of LIS

Partners

  •  
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer

Categories


• Blog
• Research Summaries
• Columns
• Core Principles of Responsible AI
• Special Topics

Signature Content


• The State Of AI Ethics

• The Living Dictionary

• The AI Ethics Brief

Learn More


• About

• Open Access Policy

• Contributions Policy

• Editorial Stance on AI Tools

• Press

• Donate

• Contact

The AI Ethics Brief (bi-weekly newsletter)

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.


Archive

  • © MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE. All rights reserved 2024.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.