• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Core Principles of Responsible AI
    • Accountability
    • Fairness
    • Privacy
    • Safety and Security
    • Sustainability
    • Transparency
  • Special Topics
    • AI in Industry
    • Ethical Implications
    • Human-Centered Design
    • Regulatory Landscape
    • Technical Methods
  • Living Dictionary
  • State of AI Ethics
  • AI Ethics Brief
  • 🇫🇷
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

South Korea as a Fourth Industrial Revolution Middle Power?

March 30, 2022

🔬 Research summary by Connor Wright, our Partnerships Manager.

[Original paper by Dongwoo Kim]


Overview: As a self-identified middle power, South Korea’s adequacy for the label is assessed within the context of the fourth industrial revolution. While the country bears the qualities to adopt the title, doing so does not come without its own baggage.


Introduction

What is a middle power? What purpose do they serve? Within this paper, South Korea is evaluated on its self-proclaimed middle power status in the fourth industrial revolution (4IR). Here, a middle power possesses the interest and capacity to work with fellow similar-sized states to strengthen governance. Consequently, their role in governance and how this is looks within the 4IR scene is examined. South Korea’s adequacy for being classed as a middle power is subsequently observed through three criteria, where I then note the challenges associated with such a position. Nevertheless, to begin with, what is their role in governance?

Key Insights

The role of middle powers in governance

Within the governmental sphere, middle powers assume the role of “policy entrepreneurs” (p. 2), starting initiatives in response to global events (such as combating climate change). Through creating such initiatives, middle powers play the role of mediators between the more considerable opposed powers (such as the US and China) to foster the acceptance of such policies. Consequently, middle powers coordinate attitudes of cohesion between these powers, establishing groups of like-minded entities through their mediation and policy efforts. The fourth industrial revolution (4IR) proves a beneficial use case to view such play in action.

The 4IR

An essential part of the 4IR is the increase in connectedness between systems. Consequently, more data is being produced and recorded, making them harder to track, govern and monitor. Moreover, the diminishing control of a nation’s sovereignty accompanies this lack of control. States are pressured to provide environments conducive to such change but are also expected to keep up with regulating the space, which is not always possible.

Subsequently, middle powers can prove a helpful sandbox to how such data policy can look. However, what does it take for a country to be classed as a middle power? In answer to this question, the author proposes three necessary (but not sufficient) and independent criteria to assess whether South Korea would make the cut.

South Korea and becoming a middle power: three criteria

Technology

Middle powers must possess expertise and capacity in current technology for a state to constructively contribute to the technology space. Given South Korea’s technological history and emergence as a technological hub, the country resolutely fulfils this criterion.

Networks

Becoming a middle power is not just about knowing individuals. Instead, their role is to rally like-minded nations and non-state actors (such as in research and industry) to mobilise coordination. Concerning South Korea, its sustained good relationships with both Washington and Beijing, while also bearing strong links with non-state actors, fulfils the criteria yet again.

Governance

The 4IR entails a systemic change that needs to be monitored appropriately by regulation. South Korea’s whole-nation approach to governance allows for strong attention to administrative tasks and building relationships to influence the 4IR effects. Hence, the country passes the third and final test.

In sum, South Korea’s self-proclaimed middle power status is vindicated. Nevertheless, acting as a middle person is not always easy.

Challenges

Through its ties to both Washington and Beijing, South Korea does lose sovereignty over policy to maintain good relations with both sides. A consequence of maintaining these relations could be a focus on the economic side of technology, with the US wanting to sure up its defence against Chinese tech domination. Yet, if economic values are prioritised, then the South Korean Government may receive backlash for not addressing the social issues at hand. As a result, the task of serving as a middle power becomes a balancing act.

Between the lines

South Korea certainly seems to fit the bill for its middle power status. While this allows the country to be a policy initiator and maintain relations in both the West and the East, doing so does come with its own baggage. South Korea’s transition to a developed economy is a fantastic feat. Yet, perhaps a question could still be asked about whether the country would achieve more or less if they were to abandon this position? One thing’s for sure, the 4IR is upon us, and it will give us an answer.

Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

🔍 SEARCH

Spotlight

Beyond Consultation: Building Inclusive AI Governance for Canada’s Democratic Future

AI Policy Corner: U.S. Executive Order on Advancing AI Education for American Youth

AI Policy Corner: U.S. Copyright Guidance on Works Created with AI

AI Policy Corner: AI for Good Summit 2025

AI Policy Corner: Japan’s AI Promotion Act

related posts

  • From OECD to India: Exploring cross-cultural differences in perceived trust, responsibility and reli...

    From OECD to India: Exploring cross-cultural differences in perceived trust, responsibility and reli...

  • A Taxonomy of Foundation Model based Systems for Responsible-AI-by-Design

    A Taxonomy of Foundation Model based Systems for Responsible-AI-by-Design

  • REAL ML: Recognizing, Exploring, and Articulating Limitations of Machine Learning Research

    REAL ML: Recognizing, Exploring, and Articulating Limitations of Machine Learning Research

  • From the Gut? Questions on Artificial Intelligence and Music

    From the Gut? Questions on Artificial Intelligence and Music

  • Measuring Disparate Outcomes of Content Recommendation Algorithms with Distributional Inequality Met...

    Measuring Disparate Outcomes of Content Recommendation Algorithms with Distributional Inequality Met...

  • The State of AI Ethics Report (Jan 2021)

    The State of AI Ethics Report (Jan 2021)

  • Research summary: From Rationality to Relationality: Ubuntu as an Ethical & Human Rights Framework f...

    Research summary: From Rationality to Relationality: Ubuntu as an Ethical & Human Rights Framework f...

  • The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Research

    The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Research

  • Ethics of AI‑Enabled Recruiting and Selection: A Review and Research Agenda

    Ethics of AI‑Enabled Recruiting and Selection: A Review and Research Agenda

  • Theorizing Femininity in AI: a Framework for Undoing Technology’s Gender Troubles (Research Summary)

    Theorizing Femininity in AI: a Framework for Undoing Technology’s Gender Troubles (Research Summary)

Partners

  •  
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer

Categories


• Blog
• Research Summaries
• Columns
• Core Principles of Responsible AI
• Special Topics

Signature Content


• The State Of AI Ethics

• The Living Dictionary

• The AI Ethics Brief

Learn More


• About

• Open Access Policy

• Contributions Policy

• Editorial Stance on AI Tools

• Press

• Donate

• Contact

The AI Ethics Brief (bi-weekly newsletter)

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.


Archive

  • © 2025 MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.