• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

  • Articles
    • Public Policy
    • Privacy & Security
    • Human Rights
      • Ethics
      • JEDI (Justice, Equity, Diversity, Inclusion
    • Climate
    • Design
      • Emerging Technology
    • Application & Adoption
      • Health
      • Education
      • Government
        • Military
        • Public Works
      • Labour
    • Arts & Culture
      • Film & TV
      • Music
      • Pop Culture
      • Digital Art
  • Columns
    • AI Policy Corner
    • Recess
    • Tech Futures
  • The AI Ethics Brief
  • AI Literacy
    • Research Summaries
    • AI Ethics Living Dictionary
    • Learning Community
  • The State of AI Ethics Report
    • Volume 7 (November 2025)
    • Volume 6 (February 2022)
    • Volume 5 (July 2021)
    • Volume 4 (April 2021)
    • Volume 3 (Jan 2021)
    • Volume 2 (Oct 2020)
    • Volume 1 (June 2020)
  • About
    • Our Contributions Policy
    • Our Open Access Policy
    • Contact
    • Donate

Teaching AI Ethics Using Science Fiction (Research summary)

September 21, 2020

Summary contributed by our researcher Connor Wright (Philosophy, University of Exeter)

*Link to original paper + authors at the bottom.


Mini-summary: Having caused at least some of the fears surrounding AI, science fiction is being repurposed as the method of increasing the engagement of computer science students in the ethical space. Given how technologists do not work in an ethical vacuum, science fiction’s ability to present current situations in unfamiliar settings and encourage the consideration of different viewpoints represent this practice as ethics’ lifeline towards being properly considered. Ethics can no longer be seen as something to be ticked off the list after one class by technology practitioners, and science fiction can present ethics in a way to strongly prevent that. The more students that engage in this space the better, and science fiction poses a surprising amount of potential.


Full summary:

It wouldn’t prove shocking to say how science fiction has had its fair share in generating some of the AI fears of today. From iRobot to Terminator, science fiction has formed the basis of many people’s fears and concerns with AI technology. However, the authors of this paper have turned this on its head. Now, science fiction is being proposed as a way to unlock and make more accessible the AI ethics space to computer science students, and they make a good point. I’ll now explain why.

Given how technical practitioners are no longer being met solely with technical questions, the practice has now expanded into the realm of ethics. This has generally not been well-received by technologists such as computer science students, with ethics already being seen as something to tick off the lost after one class. The educational elitism stemming from ethics (and philosophy in general) in the Greek ages, and often throwing up more questions than answers, it’s been viewed as out of place in the dualistic environment of computer science. The authors dully make this observation and draw an interesting comparison to the way the subject is taught. Here, in order to establish a firm grounding of the basics, computer science is generally taught with an authoritative overtone, leaving very little room for dissent. As a result, a mindset of ‘absolute truths’ is generated within the field, with the basics being taught seen as unquestionable. With this mindset, it’s easy to see why considering multiple viewpoints on even basic concepts is considered as a best practice rather than a requirement. However, the authors see a way to solve this, and it goes by the name of science fiction.

Science fiction posses the ability to represent current ethical problems without the veil of educational necessity, reducing the barrier to entry for the topic. Furthermore, the weird and unfamiliar representations of these problems make it more difficult to arrive at a viewpoint on the topic. Resultantly, students are encouraged to utilise their critical thinking skills and consider multiple viewpoints at the same time. For example, the problem of self-driving cars. While the decision to implement the technology was to save countless lives from road traffic accidents, even the best intentions have grave consequences. While preventing the deaths of many, the technology will not prevent mass unemployment resulting from the technology slowly replacing human-centered driving tasks (such as long-distance truck journeys and taxi drivers). Hence, tackling such an issue through a different, engaging, science fiction example will help to bring these concerns to light.

One of the most important points to consider in light of this proposal is the shift in mindset associated with the practice of ethics. Instead of being orientated around academic tradition, ethics is now being framed as ‘practical ethics’ which encompasses and can be applied to current situations. Instead of debating about the theory and then applying it to the problem, the problem is considered first in order to garner intuitions before launching into a moral framework. Above all, this problem-centered approach keeps the considerations relevant to the students, as well as creating a tangible motivation as to why an ethics course is important in the computer science space.

Creating engaging content without the educational barrier to entry, ethics is able to be re-marketed as an engaging and worthy topic in the computer science world. Permitting the consideration of other viewpoints in unfamiliar scenarios and its up-to-date nature, science fiction stands itself in good stead to help further ethics’ cause. The proliferation of technology thanks to AI has now made ethics a priority in the space, and the more students that engage in the practice, the more refined our AI future gets.


Original paper by Emmanuelle Burton, Judy Goldsmith, Nicholas Mattei: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/WS/AAAIW15/paper/view/10139/10129

Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

🔍 SEARCH

Spotlight

The undying sun hangs in the sky, as people gather around signal towers, working through their digital devices.

Dreams and Realities in Modi’s AI Impact Summit

Illustration of a coral reef ecosystem

Tech Futures: Diversity of Thought and Experience: The UN’s Scientific Panel on AI

This image shows a large white, traditional, old building. The top half of the building represents the humanities (which is symbolised by the embedded text from classic literature which is faintly shown ontop the building). The bottom section of the building is embossed with mathematical formulas to represent the sciences. The middle layer of the image is heavily pixelated. On the steps at the front of the building there is a group of scholars, wearing formal suits and tie attire, who are standing around at the enternace talking and some of them are sitting on the steps. There are two stone, statute-like hands that are stretching the building apart from the left side. In the forefront of the image, there are 8 students - which can only be seen from the back. Their graduation gowns have bright blue hoods and they all look as though they are walking towards the old building which is in the background at a distance. There are a mix of students in the foreground.

Tech Futures: Co-opting Research and Education

Agentic AI systems and algorithmic accountability: a new era of e-commerce

ALL IN Conference 2025: Four Key Takeaways from Montreal

related posts

  • Social Media Algorithms: The Code Behind Your Life

    Social Media Algorithms: The Code Behind Your Life

  • Measuring Surprise in the Wild

    Measuring Surprise in the Wild

  • The Impact of Recommendation Systems on Opinion Dynamics: Microscopic versus Macroscopic Effects

    The Impact of Recommendation Systems on Opinion Dynamics: Microscopic versus Macroscopic Effects

  • Hazard Contribution Modes of Machine Learning Components (Research Summary)

    Hazard Contribution Modes of Machine Learning Components (Research Summary)

  • AI Art and Misinformation: Approaches and Strategies for Media Literacy and Fact-Checking

    AI Art and Misinformation: Approaches and Strategies for Media Literacy and Fact-Checking

  • Routing with Privacy for Drone Package Delivery Systems

    Routing with Privacy for Drone Package Delivery Systems

  • LLM-Deliberation: Evaluating LLMs with Interactive Multi-Agent Negotiation Games

    LLM-Deliberation: Evaluating LLMs with Interactive Multi-Agent Negotiation Games

  • Algorithmic accountability for the public sector

    Algorithmic accountability for the public sector

  • Research summary: Algorithmic Injustices towards a Relational Ethics

    Research summary: Algorithmic Injustices towards a Relational Ethics

  • Unpacking Human-AI interaction (HAII) in safety-critical industries

    Unpacking Human-AI interaction (HAII) in safety-critical industries

Partners

  •  
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer


Articles

Columns

AI Literacy

The State of AI Ethics Report


 

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.

Contact

Donate


  • © 2025 MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.