• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Core Principles of Responsible AI
    • Accountability
    • Fairness
    • Privacy
    • Safety and Security
    • Sustainability
    • Transparency
  • Special Topics
    • AI in Industry
    • Ethical Implications
    • Human-Centered Design
    • Regulatory Landscape
    • Technical Methods
  • Living Dictionary
  • State of AI Ethics
  • AI Ethics Brief
  • šŸ‡«šŸ‡·
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

Global AI Ethics: Examples, Directory, and a Call to Action

May 26, 2022

šŸ”¬ Original article by Ravit Dotan, a researcher in AI ethics, impact investing, philosophy of science, feminist philosophy, and their intersections.


As AI applications become widespread, it is increasingly important to understand and manage their impact on people, society, and the environment. AI ethicists have been working hard toward this goal, producing research, policies, and tools to evaluate and improve the ethical dimensions of AI systems. However, a major gap in AI ethics has emerged: Western countries are massively over-represented. For example, studies have shown that the US and European countries dominate the production of AI ethics guidelines (e.g., this study and this study).

The Western dominance disadvantages those who are affiliated with other parts of the world and therefore inhibits the field of AI ethics. In this article, I review a few examples of work in AI ethics that center on non-Western issues, highlighting non-Western values, needs, circumstances, and perspectives on AI. In addition, I present a directory of experts in non-Western AI ethics, curated by myself and Dr. Emmanuel Goffi, co-director of the Global AI Ethics Institute. The directory includes the names and contact information of the experts, as well as links to samples of their work.

Values

Western values are different from the values of other cultural groups. Therefore, Western guidelines for ethical AI sometimes conflict with non-Western value systems.

For example, Mary Carman and Benjamin Roseman bring out a conflict with African values. One of the widespread themes in AI ethics today is that AI systems should protect human autonomy. According to this principle, to use the influential definition given by Luciano Floridi and his colleagues, ā€œindividuals have a right to make decisions for themselves about the treatment they do or not receive.ā€ Carmen and Roseman argue that this principle conflicts with common communitarian values in African cultures due to its emphasis on individual decision-making. In many African cultures, they point out, decision-making is a communal process that might include family members as well as authority figures. ā€œThe salience of community versus a strong individualism,ā€ they argue, ā€œillustrates why we require…sensitivity in how we adopt and adapt the principles in different contexts, if we are to apply them.ā€

Junaid Qadir and Muhammad Suleman highlight Islamic perspectives on AI ethics. They argue that resources on digital ethics, such as IEEE and ACM guidelines, are based on secular ethics. However, Islamic ethics is very different. Therefore, they developed a unique course, titled ā€œEthics, Value and Technologyā€, for their students in Pakistan. This course, described in their paper, discusses ethical issues related to technology, including AI, from both Western and Islamic perspectives.

Needs and Circumstances

Some distinct needs of non-Western communities stem from their cultural traditions. For example, Angie Abdilla and her colleagues describe how Western AI systems can overlook Aboriginal Australian traditions. For example, traditionally, it is very important that aboriginals avoid speaking or exchanging goods with their in-laws. However, if not careful, AI applications may create these forbidden interactions. For instance, a smart fridge could share one’s food with their mother-in-law.

Moreover, as Chimayi Arun points out, AI can be more harmful to people in and from non-Western regions when the AI’s design is unsuitable for non-Western contexts. To illustrate, Arun uses an analogy. Houses built for the cold climate of Northern Europe are unsuitable for warmer cities in developing countries. Similarly, AI systems built in Western contexts may be unsuitable for non-Western contexts.

For example, Arun points out that social media platforms, such as Facebook, were built in a Western context in which independent journalism flourishes. The availability of independent journalism provides social media users with ample sources for fact-checking. However, in countries where free journalism is scarce, it is harder to combat the disinformation and hate speech that spread so easily on social media. 

Arun illustrates how devastating the results can be by appealing to the violence against Muslims in Myanmar. In Myanmar, military officials systematically used Facebook to spread misinformation and hate against Muslims. Given that the state heavily controls the press, residents had few resources to check the veracity of the posts. The influence of the military’s Facebook campaign was so extensive, that former military officials, researchers, and civilian officials have argued that the military used Facebook as a tool for ethnic cleansing.

Perspectives on AI

An Ipsos survey found a correlation between people’s opinion of AI and their country’s economic development level. For example, people in developing countries are much more likely to trust AI and have a positive outlook on AI services. For this reason, it is important to study perspectives on AI outside of the Western world in particular.

Arisa Ema and her colleagues studied perceptions of AI in Japan. For example, the team asked Japanese survey respondents which activities are the most suitable to be done by AI alone, without human supervision. The respondents favored driving, disaster prevention, and military activities. Popular stated reasons were that reliance on AI would reduce mistakes and increase reliability when it comes to these activities. Another finding is that, on the whole, people in Japan have low confidence that the government can prevent the misuse of AI. However, the confidence is higher among the general public than in other groups.

The need for diversity in AI ethics

AI systems affect the entire planet. However, efforts to understand and manage AI’s impact focus on Western countries, whose values, needs, circumstances, and perspective do not generalize to other parts of the world. The result can be disadvantageous and oppressive to those who are affiliated with non-Western cultures. 

We should work to change the landscape of AI ethics to include more perspectives. To make global perspectives more accessible, Dr. Emmanuel Goffi and I have created a curated directory of people with expertise in non-Western AI ethics. 

We ask the reader to keep in mind that this directory is not exhaustive. First, we chose only to include experts we could contact and explicitly consented to be included. Second, it is likely that we haven’t identified all relevant experts. Therefore, we encourage the reader to see this directory as a starting point for exploring non-Western perspectives on AI ethics. 

With that in mind, we would also like to recommend some related resources:

  • Global AI Narratives Network
  • A+ Global Directory
  • Global AI Ethics Institute
  • Tech on Earth

The directory is as follows:

NameRegion or Cultural group or expertiseWebsiteSample public content
Abeba BirhaneSub-Saharan Africahttps://abebabirhane.github.io/ Algorithmic Colonization of Africa
Amana RaquibIslamhttps://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Amana-Raquib-2154638422Culturally Informed Pro-Social AI Regulation and Persuasion Framework
Angie AbdillaOceaniahttps://oldwaysnew.com/#country-centred-designOut of the Black Box: Indigenous protocols for AI
Arisa EmmaJapanhttps://ifi.u-tokyo.ac.jp/en/people/ema-arisa/ Future Relations between Humans and Artificial Intelligence: A Stakeholder Opinion Survey in Japan
Arthur GwagwaSub-Saharan Africa, Sino-African relationshttps://www.uu.nl/staff/EAGwagwaThe role of the African value of Ubuntu in global AI inclusion discourse: A normative ethics perspective
Benjamin RosmanSub-Saharan Africawww.raillab.org / www.benjaminrosman.comApplying a principle of explicability to AI research in Africa: should we do it?
Connor WrightSub-Saharan Africahttps://www.linkedin.com/in/connor-wright-931729168/Research Summary: Ubuntu’s Implications for Philosophical Ethics (Original talk by Thaddeus Metz)
Emmanuel R. GoffiGeneral non-Western AI ethicshttps://www.linkedin.com/in/emmanuelgoffi/ Escaping the Western Cosm-Ethical Hegemony: The Importance of Cultural Diversity in the Ethical Assessment of Artificial Intelligence
Emma Ruttkamp-BloemAfricahttps://www.linkedin.com/in/emma-ruttkamp-bloem-19400248/Re-imagining Current AI Ethics Policy Debates: A View from the Ethics of Technologyā€˜Trustworthiness of AI is mainly a socio-technical concept’
Favour BorokiniAfricahttps://www.linkedin.com/in/favourborokini/?originalSubdomain=ngEngendering AI: A Gender and Ethics Perspective on Artificial Intelligence in Africa
Jassim JajiEAU and MENA regionhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-jassim-haji-7b5885125/AI ethics in the West is not necessarily the same as in the Middle East
Junaid QadirIslamic ethicshttps://www.linkedin.com/in/junaidq/Teaching Ethics, (Islamic) Values and Technology: Musings on Course Design and Experience
Karaitiana TaiuruMaorihttps://www.linkedin.com/in/ktaiuru/?originalSubdomain=nzTreaty of Waitangi/Te Tiriti and Māori ethics guidelines for: AI, algorithms, data and IOT
Linda BonyoSub-Saharan Africahttps://www.linkedin.com/in/lindabonyo/ 
Mary CarmanSub-Saharan Africahttps://marycarman.comDefining what’s ethical in artificial intelligence needs input from Africans
Michael Running Wolf Jr.Native Americanshttps://www.linkedin.com/in/runningwolf/Indigenous AI
Nagla RizkAfrica, Egypthttps://www1.aucegypt.edu/faculty/naglarzk/index.htmlArtificial intelligence (AI) Deployments in Africa: Benefits, Challenges and Policy Dimensions
Neema IyerAfricahttps://neemaiyer.com/Afrofeminist Data Futures
Paola RicaurteMexico-LATAMhttps://www.tierracomun.net/, aplusalliance.orgData Epistemologies, The Coloniality of Power, and Resistance
Pak-Hang WongAsiahttps://www.linkedin.com/in/wongpakhang/Why Confucianism Matters in Ethics of Technology
Rajiv MalhotraVedic philosophyhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/rajivmalhotra2007/Where is India in the battle for AI ? AI & You Podcast Part 1 w/ Peter J. Scott
Raziye Buse ƇetinTurkey, Middle East, and Islamhttps://linktr.ee/busecettWisdom of not knowing and decolonial AI
Rupa SinghIndiahttps://www.linkedin.com/in/rupa-singh-10926820/Ethics in AI Workshop by Rupa Singh
Sabelo Sethu MhlambiSub-Saharan Africahttps://sabelo.mhlambi.com/about/From Rationality to Relationality: Ubuntu as an Ethical and Human Rights Framework for Artificial Intelligence Governance
Saida BeloualiMENAhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/saida-belouali-8a5b2a7/ Questioning the universality of an ethic of AI through an analysis of the code of Dubai 
(in French, English version to be published soon)
Shuang Lu FrostAsiahttps://www.linkedin.com/in/shuangfrost/https://verticalatlas.hetnieuweinstituut.nl/en/chinaai
Soraj HongladaromThailand, Buddhismhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/soraj-hongladarom-13656416/The Ethics of AI and Robotics: A Buddhist Viewpoint
Yi ZengChinahttps://www.linkedin.com/in/yi-zeng-097757122 Deep Coordination among Development, Ethics, and Governance of Science and Technology
Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

šŸ” SEARCH

Spotlight

AI Policy Corner: Frontier AI Safety Commitments, AI Seoul Summit 2024

AI Policy Corner: The Colorado State Deepfakes Act

Special Edition: Honouring the Legacy of Abhishek Gupta (1992–2024)

AI Policy Corner: The Turkish Artificial Intelligence Law Proposal

From Funding Crisis to AI Misuse: Critical Digital Rights Challenges from RightsCon 2025

related posts

  • Algorithmic Impact Assessments – What Impact Do They Have?

    Algorithmic Impact Assessments – What Impact Do They Have?

  • Principios Ć©ticos para una inteligencia artificial antropocĆ©ntrica: consensos actuales desde una per...

    Principios Ʃticos para una inteligencia artificial antropocƩntrica: consensos actuales desde una per...

  • The Paris AI Summit: Deregulation, Fear, and Surveillance

    The Paris AI Summit: Deregulation, Fear, and Surveillance

  • Data Pooling in Capital Markets and its Implications

    Data Pooling in Capital Markets and its Implications

  • Is ChatGPT for everyone? Seeing beyond the hype toward responsible use in education

    Is ChatGPT for everyone? Seeing beyond the hype toward responsible use in education

  • Can an AI be sentient? Cultural perspectives on sentience and on the potential ethical implications ...

    Can an AI be sentient? Cultural perspectives on sentience and on the potential ethical implications ...

  • The coming AI 'culture war'

    The coming AI 'culture war'

  • Social Media Algorithms: The Code Behind Your Life

    Social Media Algorithms: The Code Behind Your Life

  • Artificial Intelligence in healthcare: providing ease or ethical dilemmas?

    Artificial Intelligence in healthcare: providing ease or ethical dilemmas?

  • AI Governance on the Ground: Canada’s Algorithmic Impact Assessment Process and Algorithm has evolve...

    AI Governance on the Ground: Canada’s Algorithmic Impact Assessment Process and Algorithm has evolve...

Partners

  • Ā 
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer

Categories


• Blog
• Research Summaries
• Columns
• Core Principles of Responsible AI
• Special Topics

Signature Content


• The State Of AI Ethics

• The Living Dictionary

• The AI Ethics Brief

Learn More


• About

• Open Access Policy

• Contributions Policy

• Editorial Stance on AI Tools

• Press

• Donate

• Contact

The AI Ethics Brief (bi-weekly newsletter)

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.


Archive

  • Ā© MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE. All rights reserved 2024.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.