• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

  • Articles
    • Public Policy
    • Privacy & Security
    • Human Rights
      • Ethics
      • JEDI (Justice, Equity, Diversity, Inclusion
    • Climate
    • Design
      • Emerging Technology
    • Application & Adoption
      • Health
      • Education
      • Government
        • Military
        • Public Works
      • Labour
    • Arts & Culture
      • Film & TV
      • Music
      • Pop Culture
      • Digital Art
  • Columns
    • AI Policy Corner
    • Recess
    • Tech Futures
  • The AI Ethics Brief
  • AI Literacy
    • Research Summaries
    • AI Ethics Living Dictionary
    • Learning Community
  • The State of AI Ethics Report
    • State of AI Ethics Report Volume 8 (2026): Call for Contributors
    • Volume 7 (November 2025)
    • Volume 6 (February 2022)
    • Volume 5 (July 2021)
    • Volume 4 (April 2021)
    • Volume 3 (Jan 2021)
    • Volume 2 (Oct 2020)
    • Volume 1 (June 2020)
  • About
    • Our Contributions Policy
    • Our Open Access Policy
    • Contact
    • Donate

Evolution in Age-Verification Applications: Can AI Open Some New Horizons?

November 24, 2021

🔬 Original article by Azfar Adib, who is currently pursuing his PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering in Concordia University in Montreal, with research focus on ECG based age verification. He is a Senior Member in the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE).


Have you been ever asked to proof your age or verify your identity while you tried to buy any product or service? Many readers here may answer yes to this question. Whether it’d be buying a bottle of wine or signing up for our first driving lesson, age-verification requirements have existed for long. Similarly, a wide range of online applications now requires age-verification before providing service or content access to users.  So, in this digital age, this has become a broad area of research and product development. 

According to a report by MarketsandMarkets, global market of identity verification is expected to grow from USD 7.6 billion in 2020 to USD 15.8 billion by 2025 [1]. In its recent directory, “Digital ID & Authentication Council of Canada” (DIACC) has enlisted 73 member companies providing a variety of digital authentication services in a continuously growing market [2]. 

Age verification is becoming crucial in various dimensions. An increasingly under-18 digital population has heightened pressure from regulatory and non-regulatory entities on service providers to implement more stringent assurances, so that children are kept safe online. Also, age verification is no longer just limited to segregation between adult and under-aged ones, it has other applications too. For instance, estimating age of unidentified patients in hospital emergency can be a crucial decision for physicians.

So accuracy and consistency of age verification tools are quite crucial.  Equally important is to maintain their ethical standards; particularly privacy, bias-avoidance and data security. Advancement of AI is playing a key role here. Let us have a look that at some key transformation occurring in this arena:

From paper-based to digital:

Paper based identification documents (like- driving license, health card or other government issued ID documents) have been the most prevalent verification scheme during in-person transactions. For digital transactions and often during in-person transactions also, their paperless versions (picture of ID documents) are widely used.  

The concurrent trend, particularly fueled by the COVID-19 pandemic, is inclining more towards to the paperless version and beyond. In a survey carried out by Interac in August 2020 among adult Canadians, majority of the respondents expressed hygiene concerns around physical ID. They were also concerned to keep their identity data safe online, and felt is risky to take a picture of a physical ID [3]. Fraudulent activities are indeed becoming a major concern here for both users and service providers. This indicates the need for more secured and seamless digital identification schemes. 

Emergence of biometrics

Biometric identification, being widely used across the globe, enables automated recognition of individuals through certain physiological characteristics like- facial image, fingerprint, iris, voice, gait, signature, heart signal, gait etc.  A research by Juniper has predicted that 95 percent of mobile users will adopt biometrics for authentication by 2025. Interestingly, as this research showed, face biometrics expansion was not slowed down by increased face mask usage during COVID-19 pandemic [4]. 

Cutting-edge machine learning schemes have been playing a pivotal role in enhancing accuracy in biometrics. However, biometrics are a form of deterministic data, where people are identified by matching with their previously stored record, mostly through supervised algorithms. While facial recognition often claims high classification accuracy (over 90%), these outcomes may not be universal. Some research (like the 2018 “Gender Shades” project  research  carried out by MIT Media Lab and Microsoft Research) exposes increasing error rate of facial recognition across marginalized demographic groups, with the poorest accuracy consistently found in subjects who are female, Black, and 18-30 years old.  Overcoming such bias remains a continuous endeavour for researchers-developers [5].

Despite increasing level of implementation, some people still remain reluctant to use biometrics, especially when it involves their image capturing, voice recording or physical touch.  So contactless, non-vocal and non-facial biometric schemes are also being developed as alternates. A very recent example is finger vein-based biometrics to verify a person’s COVID-19 vaccination status, being developed by Hitachi and Kyushu University in Japan [6].

Non-anonymous identification to anonymous identification

As users are becoming more conscious regarding their data and privacy, they are preferring more controls over where their data is shared. In a July 2021 survey conducted by Liminal, a quarter of consumers stated that they actively avoided using fingerprint or facial biometrics on smartphones due to privacy concerns. Three-quarters of consumers desired to control and revoke access to their identity data any time [7]. 

Such demand from users puts forth the relatively novel concept of anonymous age verification. In existing technologies, age verification is actually a part of a holistic authentication scheme, where individuals get completely identified based on their previously stored credentials. The purpose of anonymous age verification is to estimate any person’s age (or age range) instantly from certain biometrics data, without any prior info about them, thus avoiding their complete identification.

From technological and biological perspectives this remains a daunting task, but research on this is continuing, mostly through a combination of supervised and un-supervised algorithms. In a study jointly carried out in Michigan State University and Beihand University based on GAN (Generative Adversarial Network), researchers have estimated age progression through facial analysis with accuracies of over 99% [8].  Age estimation is also being attempted from ECG (Electrocardiogram), which has recently emerged as a promising biometric scheme [9].

As age-verification tools keep evolving, artificial intelligence will obviously continue its dominant role in this journey of continuous enhancement. Ethical considerations need to be at the core of this progress. And we may not be far away from a world where just an instant biometric signal will be enough to identify our age, without any document or prior data.

References

1. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/identity-verification-market-178660742.html

2. https://diacc.ca/membership/diacc-members/

3. https://newsroom.interac.ca/core-principles-for-building-digital-identity-in-canada/

4. https://www.juniperresearch.com/whitepapers/how-to-maximise-mobile-payment-security

5. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a/buolamwini18a.pdf

6. https://www.biometricupdate.com/202110/hitachi-trials-vein-biometrics-to-verify-vaccination-records

7. https://liminal.co/articles/bio-shock-is-biometric-avoidance-more-than-digital-luddism/

8. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8772083

9. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-25351-7

Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

SAIER Volume 8 (2026)

SAIER Volume 8 (2026) Call for Contributors

🔍 SEARCH

Spotlight

Vertically- and horizontally-placed chess boards and chess pieces

Tech Futures: At the Frontier of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt

Tech Futures: Introducing the Resist List

An abstract spiral of dark circles appears at the centre, resembling a tornado. Several vintage magazine covers and advertisements are being drawn toward the spiral. The artworks that have already been pulled into it are becoming distorted and replaced with clusters of numbers representing their numerical embeddings.

Tech Futures: Better Imagination for Better Tech Futures

This image is a collage with a colourful Japanese vintage landscape showing a mountain, hills, flowers and other plants and a small stream. There are 3 large black data servers placed in the bottom half of the image, with a cloud of black smoke emitting from them, partly obscuring the scenery.

Tech Futures: Crafting Participatory Tech Futures

A network diagram with lots of little emojis, organised in clusters.

Tech Futures: AI For and Against Knowledge

related posts

  • Embedded ethics: a proposal for integrating ethics into the development of medical AI

    Embedded ethics: a proposal for integrating ethics into the development of medical AI

  • A Beginner’s Guide for AI Ethics

    A Beginner’s Guide for AI Ethics

  • Artificial Intelligence and the Privacy Paradox of Opportunity, Big Data and The Digital Universe

    Artificial Intelligence and the Privacy Paradox of Opportunity, Big Data and The Digital Universe

  • Human-centred mechanism design with Democratic AI

    Human-centred mechanism design with Democratic AI

  • Whose AI Dream? In search of the aspiration in data annotation.

    Whose AI Dream? In search of the aspiration in data annotation.

  • Towards A Unified Utilitarian Ethics Framework for Healthcare Artificial Intelligence

    Towards A Unified Utilitarian Ethics Framework for Healthcare Artificial Intelligence

  • Unlocking Accuracy and Fairness in Differentially Private Image Classification

    Unlocking Accuracy and Fairness in Differentially Private Image Classification

  • Efficiency is Not Enough: A Critical Perspective of Environmentally Sustainable AI

    Efficiency is Not Enough: A Critical Perspective of Environmentally Sustainable AI

  • Broadening AI Ethics Narratives: An Indic Art View

    Broadening AI Ethics Narratives: An Indic Art View

  • Responsible Design Patterns for Machine Learning Pipelines

    Responsible Design Patterns for Machine Learning Pipelines

Partners

  •  
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer


Articles

Columns

AI Literacy

The State of AI Ethics Report


 

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.

Contact

Donate


  • © 2025 MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.