• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

  • Articles
    • Public Policy
    • Privacy & Security
    • Human Rights
      • Ethics
      • JEDI (Justice, Equity, Diversity, Inclusion
    • Climate
    • Design
      • Emerging Technology
    • Application & Adoption
      • Health
      • Education
      • Government
        • Military
        • Public Works
      • Labour
    • Arts & Culture
      • Film & TV
      • Music
      • Pop Culture
      • Digital Art
  • Columns
    • AI Policy Corner
    • Recess
  • The AI Ethics Brief
  • AI Literacy
    • Research Summaries
    • AI Ethics Living Dictionary
    • Learning Community
  • The State of AI Ethics Report
    • Volume 6 (February 2022)
    • Volume 5 (July 2021)
    • Volume 4 (April 2021)
    • Volume 3 (Jan 2021)
    • Volume 2 (Oct 2020)
    • Volume 1 (June 2020)
  • About
    • Our Contributions Policy
    • Our Open Access Policy
    • Contact
    • Donate

Analysis and Issues of Artificial Intelligence Ethics in the Process of Recruitment

January 18, 2022

馃敩 Research summary by Connor Wright, our Partnerships Manager.

[Original paper by V. Uday Kumar, A. Mohan, B.Srinivasa S P Kumar, Ramesh Ponnala, B Sateesh, P. Dundy Sai Maruthi]


Overview: AI is starting to become a household name in the hiring process for many businesses. While its involvement in the process varies from case to case, the attention required to tackle the problem of bias does not.


Introduction

AI being deployed in the hiring process is a common theme in today鈥檚 recruitment story. Nevertheless, the depth of this deployment varies from application to application. At times, the AI is used to simply schedule interviews, but it has been used to screen candidates. No matter the variation involved, the common thread that holds these applications together is the problem of AI bias. To explore this further, it fits to give some context on what AI in the hiring process looks like.

Key Insights

AI in the hiring process

Given the widely-touted capabilities of AI to streamline business resources, it has been well used in the hiring process. The AI鈥檚 involvement can range from screening candidates to scheduling interviews and even helping out in the interview process. However, the main inspiration can be seen in the AI lending a hand to filtering the sheer amounts of applications a job receives.

However, how this filtering is done varies on the application used. The paper details the following programmes which utilise AI to different depths:

  1. XOR interacts with a candidate through a chatbot.
  2. Paradox involves engaging with the candidate through a machine learning algorithm.
  3. Hiretual and AmazingHiring contain a database that it uses to match a particular profile.
  4. Pymetrics and Eightfold focus on cutting employee time spent on reviewing applications.
  5. HireVue, Seekout and MyInterview use the cloud for various tasks, including conducting interviews, filtering and outsourcing candidates.
  6. Humanly uses automated candidate screening.
  7. Fetcher and Loxo contact the candidate through emails and SMS.
  8. Textio helps write job descriptions, which then appeal to some candidates more than others as a form of filtering.

Despite a fruitful variation between the applications themselves, a common thread connects them all: the problem of bias.

The problem of bias

Five different types of bias are explored by the authors, which are all worth considering when deploying AI in the hiring process:

  1. Historical bias – hiring algorithms could contribute to concretizing past tendencies in a company. The company continues to look for what it already knows instead of prioritizing diversity.
  2. Representation bias – the dataset offered to the hiring algorithm must represent all different types of candidates. For example, collecting data only about people who went to university would ignore those who are also qualified for the job through other means, like internships.
  3. Measurement bias – candidate data is erroneously collected, such as being taken from a date outside the specified window.
  4. Aggregation bias – wrongly assuming the trends observed in the data apply to all individual data points. For example, assuming that all candidates from a particular area did not go to university based on a high school drop-out rate.
  5. Evaluation bias – giving more weight to specific character traits as opposed to others

Between the lines

While the problem of bias in AI is well-documented, I believe our attitude to confronting the phenomenon is equally important. The paper鈥檚 analysis shows the accuracy of the algorithms to vary significantly., at times involving 30% inaccuracy and others at 10%. From there, the authors point to how various surveys show that employers are not too worried about the 10% inaccuracy involved in AI ethics. For me, adopting the attitude where we do care for the 10% inaccuracy will be essential in the fight against bias, allowing us to take advantage of the deserved attention the AI Ethics field receives.

Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

馃攳 SEARCH

Spotlight

ALL IN Conference 2025: Four Key Takeaways from Montreal

Beyond Dependency: The Hidden Risk of Social Comparison in Chatbot Companionship

AI Policy Corner: Restriction vs. Regulation: Comparing State Approaches to AI Mental Health Legislation

Beyond Consultation: Building Inclusive AI Governance for Canada’s Democratic Future

AI Policy Corner: U.S. Executive Order on Advancing AI Education for American Youth

related posts

  • Toward an Ethics of AI Belief

    Toward an Ethics of AI Belief

  • Summoning a New Artificial Intelligence Patent Model: In the Age of Pandemic

    Summoning a New Artificial Intelligence Patent Model: In the Age of Pandemic

  • The Evolution of War: How AI has Changed Military Weaponry and Technology

    The Evolution of War: How AI has Changed Military Weaponry and Technology

  • Value-based Fast and Slow AI Nudging

    Value-based Fast and Slow AI Nudging

  • Research summary: Classical Ethics in A/IS

    Research summary: Classical Ethics in A/IS

  • Can ChatGPT replace a Spanish or philosophy tutor?

    Can ChatGPT replace a Spanish or philosophy tutor?

  • AI supply chains make it easy to disavow ethical accountability

    AI supply chains make it easy to disavow ethical accountability

  • Siren鈥檚 Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models

    Siren鈥檚 Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models

  • Outsourced & Automated: How AI Companies Have Taken Over Government Decision-Making

    Outsourced & Automated: How AI Companies Have Taken Over Government Decision-Making

  • Applying the TAII Framework on Tesla Bot

    Applying the TAII Framework on Tesla Bot

Partners

  • 聽
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer


Articles

Columns

AI Literacy

The State of AI Ethics Report


 

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.

Contact

Donate


  • 漏 2025 MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.