• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Core Principles of Responsible AI
    • Accountability
    • Fairness
    • Privacy
    • Safety and Security
    • Sustainability
    • Transparency
  • Special Topics
    • AI in Industry
    • Ethical Implications
    • Human-Centered Design
    • Regulatory Landscape
    • Technical Methods
  • Living Dictionary
  • State of AI Ethics
  • AI Ethics Brief
  • 🇫🇷
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

Ten Simple Rules for Good Model-sharing Practices

February 14, 2025

🔬 Research Summary by Ismael Kherroubi Garcia. Ismael is trained in business management and philosophy of the social sciences. He is the founder and CEO of Kairoi, the AI Ethics and Research Governance Consultancy; founder and co-lead of the Responsible AI Network (RAIN) at the RSA; and co-chair of the Certification Working Group at the Open Modeling Foundation (OMF).

[Original paper by Ismael Kherroubi Garcia (Kairoi), Christopher Erdmann (SciLifeLab), Sandra Gesing (US-RSE), Michael Barton (Arizona State University), Lauren Cadwallader (PLOS), Geerten Hengeveld (Netherlands Institute of Ecology), Christine R. Kirkpatrick (San Diego Supercomputer Centre), Kathryn Knight (Oak Ridge National Laboratory), Carsten Lemmen (Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon), Rebecca Ringuette (Heliophysics Digital Resource Library), Qing Zhan (Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research),  Melissa Harrison (EMBL-EBI), Feilim Mac Gabhann (Johns Hopkins University), Natalie Meyers (University of Notre Dame), Cailean Osborne (University of Oxford), Charlotte Till (Arizona State University), Paul Brenner (University of Notre Dame), Matt Buys (Datacite), Min Chen (Nanjing Normal University), Allen Lee (Arizona State University), Jason Papin (University of Virginia) and Yuhan Rao (North Carolina State University)]


Overview: Computational models are complex scientific constructs that have become essential for us to better understand the world. Many models are valuable for peers within and beyond disciplinary boundaries. This paper suggests 10 simple rules for you to both (1) ensure you share models in a way that is at least “good enough,” and (2) enable others to lead the change towards better model-sharing practices.


Introduction

The open science movement advocates for greater transparency across scientific domains for the purpose of more robust scientific work. Computational modeling, in turn, refers to a range of critical methods for studying diverse social and natural phenomena. At the intersection of open science and modeling, the Open Modeling Foundation (OMF) has a vision for “a common suite of ethics, standards, protocols, and best practices that enable modeling scientists to share knowledge and build on one another’s research.”

To this end, the OMF’s certification working group —co-chaired by Christopher Erdmann, Sandra Gesing and Ismael Kherroubi Garcia— set out to explore how open science practices can translate into computational modeling. Through a series of online workshops conducted in early 2024, the certification working group convened 14 experts and built a community of over 80 individuals to collate insights for good model-sharing practices. 

PLOS Computational Biology. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pebi.1012702.

Key Insights

The following 10 simple rules are designed to enable and promote good model-sharing practices that are tenable and flexible —this is why they are “good” and not “best” practices. We also note that we do not use “good” in its moral sense and that ethical considerations involved when sharing models and their diverse elements are beyond this paper’s scope. Incorporating some or all of the below practices into your model-sharing can significantly increase your work’s impact on the community, often resulting in increased citations, collaborations, opportunities, and funding.

1. Define what you mean by “model”

Scientists and organizations can only understand one another and collaborate effectively when they use terms in similar ways. A collision of terminology is highly likely since models can be very diverse in nature. Therefore, when sharing your models—or even just speaking about models—clearly articulate what “model” means to yourself, your team, and your community.

2. Involve the community in informing and promoting model-sharing practices

Community building is a key element in promoting good model-sharing practices. Individual model developers are embedded in larger communities, and their behaviors are guided by community norms. You may shape those norms by involving your communities when sharing models.

3. Acknowledge diverse contributions

Computational modeling is usually a multidisciplinary endeavor. Contributions may be of very different types, involving model developers, domain experts, archivists, and policy-makers. With this, you must be ready to acknowledge such a great variety of contributors, and the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) is one approach toward this goal.

4. Provide accessible documentation for the appropriate audience

Make your model reusable and more impactful by providing documentation alongside it. By “documentation,” we mean a collection of documents and additional written material that describe a computational model across its entire life cycle and along with its underlying assumptions and scientific bases. This helps communicate to diverse stakeholders why a model is worth using.

5. Embrace FAIR principles for sharing models

The FAIR principles—findability, accessibility, interoperability and reusability— have gained significant traction throughout open science initiatives. It is important that you don’t try to reinvent the wheel when it comes to good model-sharing practices. With this, you can draw on the FAIR principles when sharing information about your model in its metadata.

6. Publicly recognise and reward research software engineers

Research software engineers (RSEs) can play important roles in modeling projects but have only garnered attention in recent years. With RSEs’ varied contributions to modeling, it is important to specifically recognize and reward their work.

7. Deploy user-friendly tools for collaborative modeling practices

User-friendly tools—such as interfaces where users can request a model execution—are essential for models to be more seamlessly adopted by domain experts, including those who may lack specialized computer science training. Models often rely on complex cyberinfrastructure, and science gateways offer a solution for making modeling more accessible and straightforward.

8. Influence publishers to promote good model-sharing practices

As part of the research community, you have the power to influence what model-sharing practices are valued and adopted. Whichever your role in modeling, you should guide your peers and future scholars towards good model-sharing practices, and seek opportunities to inform the policies that publishers implement.

9. Break down silos

Working within silos is detrimental to scientific progress. With modeling being inherently multidisciplinary, you should value the role of collaborating across disciplines and organizations as central to all good model-sharing practices. After all, computational models are shared by people for scientific and policy advancement via platforms.

10. Don’t wait for perfection when sharing models

As the adage goes, perfection is the enemy of progress. We cannot be paralyzed by the desire to enact every good model-sharing practice each and every time. Rather, we must do the best we can, given the resources we have access to and the policies our institutions implement.

Between the lines

Ten Simple Rules for Good Model-sharing Practices is the result of a huge, multidisciplinary, international collaboration. The paper advocates for just that in the context of computational modeling. To make the most of models and the efforts and resources that go into them, we must seek collaboration with others, promote good practices, and enable their reuse.

In a world where modeling has proven to be such a valuable method for scientific enquiry and discovery—in biology, sociology, philosophy, astrophysics and so on—it is crucial that we are transparent about the practices that work, making it easier for others to also follow good model-sharing practices.

Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

🔍 SEARCH

Spotlight

Canada’s Minister of AI and Digital Innovation is a Historic First. Here’s What We Recommend.

Am I Literate? Redefining Literacy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

AI Policy Corner: The Texas Responsible AI Governance Act

AI Policy Corner: Singapore’s National AI Strategy 2.0

AI Governance in a Competitive World: Balancing Innovation, Regulation and Ethics | Point Zero Forum 2025

related posts

  • The Case for Anticipating Undesirable Consequences of Computing Innovations Early, Often, and Across...

    The Case for Anticipating Undesirable Consequences of Computing Innovations Early, Often, and Across...

  • Augmented Datasheets for Speech Datasets and Ethical Decision-Making

    Augmented Datasheets for Speech Datasets and Ethical Decision-Making

  • A Lesson From AI: Ethics Is Not an Imitation Game

    A Lesson From AI: Ethics Is Not an Imitation Game

  • The Ethics of AI Business Practices: A Review of 47 AI Ethics Guidelines

    The Ethics of AI Business Practices: A Review of 47 AI Ethics Guidelines

  • Auditing for Human Expertise

    Auditing for Human Expertise

  • Seeing Like a Toolkit: How Toolkits Envision the Work of AI Ethics

    Seeing Like a Toolkit: How Toolkits Envision the Work of AI Ethics

  • Longitudinal Fairness with Censorship

    Longitudinal Fairness with Censorship

  • AI Ethics Maturity Model

    AI Ethics Maturity Model

  • Reduced, Reused, and Recycled: The Life of a Benchmark in Machine Learning Research

    Reduced, Reused, and Recycled: The Life of a Benchmark in Machine Learning Research

  • The Ethics of Emotion in AI Systems (Research Summary)

    The Ethics of Emotion in AI Systems (Research Summary)

Partners

  •  
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer

Categories


• Blog
• Research Summaries
• Columns
• Core Principles of Responsible AI
• Special Topics

Signature Content


• The State Of AI Ethics

• The Living Dictionary

• The AI Ethics Brief

Learn More


• About

• Open Access Policy

• Contributions Policy

• Editorial Stance on AI Tools

• Press

• Donate

• Contact

The AI Ethics Brief (bi-weekly newsletter)

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.


Archive

  • © MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE. All rights reserved 2024.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.