• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

  • Articles
    • Public Policy
    • Privacy & Security
    • Human Rights
      • Ethics
      • JEDI (Justice, Equity, Diversity, Inclusion
    • Climate
    • Design
      • Emerging Technology
    • Application & Adoption
      • Health
      • Education
      • Government
        • Military
        • Public Works
      • Labour
    • Arts & Culture
      • Film & TV
      • Music
      • Pop Culture
      • Digital Art
  • Columns
    • AI Policy Corner
    • Recess
  • The AI Ethics Brief
  • AI Literacy
    • Research Summaries
    • AI Ethics Living Dictionary
    • Learning Community
  • The State of AI Ethics Report
    • Volume 6 (February 2022)
    • Volume 5 (July 2021)
    • Volume 4 (April 2021)
    • Volume 3 (Jan 2021)
    • Volume 2 (Oct 2020)
    • Volume 1 (June 2020)
  • About
    • Our Contributions Policy
    • Our Open Access Policy
    • Contact
    • Donate

Response to Mila’s Proposal for a Contact Tracing App

June 9, 2020

Full paper in PDF formDownload

Below is the excerpted introduction from the full paper, authored by Allison Cohen, Abhishek Gupta, Tania De Gasperis, Marianna B Ganapini, Camylle Lanteigne, and Victoria Heath.

Introduction

Contact tracing has grown in popularity as a promising solution to the COVID-19 pandemic. The benefits of automated contact tracing are two-fold. Contact tracing promises to reduce the number of infections by being able to: 1) systematically identify all of those that have been in contact with someone who has had COVID; and, 2) ensure those that have been exposed to the virus do not unknowingly infect others. 

“COVI” is the name of a recent contact tracing app developed by Mila and was proposed to help combat COVID-19 in Canada. The app was designed to inform each individual of their relative risk of being infected with the virus, which Mila claimed would empower citizens to make informed decisions about their movement and allow for a data-driven approach to public health policy; all the while ensuring data is safeguarded from governments, companies, and individuals.  

This article will provide a critical response to Mila’s COVI White Paper. Specifically, this article will discuss: the extent to which diversity has been considered in the design of the app, assumptions surrounding users’ interaction with the app and the app’s utility, as well as unanswered questions surrounding transparency, accountability, and security.

We see this as an opportunity to supplement the excellent risk analysis done by the COVI team to surface insights that can be applied to other contact- and proximity-tracing apps that are being developed and deployed across the world. Our hope is that, through a meaningful dialogue, we can ultimately help organizations develop better solutions that respect the fundamental rights and values of the communities these solutions are meant to serve.

Full paper in PDF formDownload
Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

🔍 SEARCH

Spotlight

ALL IN Conference 2025: Four Key Takeaways from Montreal

Beyond Dependency: The Hidden Risk of Social Comparison in Chatbot Companionship

AI Policy Corner: Restriction vs. Regulation: Comparing State Approaches to AI Mental Health Legislation

Beyond Consultation: Building Inclusive AI Governance for Canada’s Democratic Future

AI Policy Corner: U.S. Executive Order on Advancing AI Education for American Youth

related posts

  • Research Summary: Geo-indistinguishability: Differential privacy for location-based systems

    Research Summary: Geo-indistinguishability: Differential privacy for location-based systems

  • The struggle for recognition in the age of facial recognition technology

    The struggle for recognition in the age of facial recognition technology

  • The Social Contract for AI

    The Social Contract for AI

  • Siren’s Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models

    Siren’s Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models

  • Designing a Future Worth Wanting: Applying Virtue Ethics to Human–Computer Interaction

    Designing a Future Worth Wanting: Applying Virtue Ethics to Human–Computer Interaction

  • Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology View

    Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology View

  • AI Policy Corner: Japan’s AI Promotion Act

    AI Policy Corner: Japan’s AI Promotion Act

  • The Ethical AI Startup Ecosystem 03: ModelOps, Monitoring, and Observability

    The Ethical AI Startup Ecosystem 03: ModelOps, Monitoring, and Observability

  • Towards Climate Awareness in NLP Research

    Towards Climate Awareness in NLP Research

  • Summoning a New Artificial Intelligence Patent Model: In the Age of Pandemic

    Summoning a New Artificial Intelligence Patent Model: In the Age of Pandemic

Partners

  •  
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer


Articles

Columns

AI Literacy

The State of AI Ethics Report


 

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.

Contact

Donate


  • © 2025 MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.