• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Core Principles of Responsible AI
    • Accountability
    • Fairness
    • Privacy
    • Safety and Security
    • Sustainability
    • Transparency
  • Special Topics
    • AI in Industry
    • Ethical Implications
    • Human-Centered Design
    • Regulatory Landscape
    • Technical Methods
  • Living Dictionary
  • State of AI Ethics
  • AI Ethics Brief
  • 🇫🇷
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

Response to Mila’s Proposal for a Contact Tracing App

June 9, 2020

Full paper in PDF formDownload

Below is the excerpted introduction from the full paper, authored by Allison Cohen, Abhishek Gupta, Tania De Gasperis, Marianna B Ganapini, Camylle Lanteigne, and Victoria Heath.

Introduction

Contact tracing has grown in popularity as a promising solution to the COVID-19 pandemic. The benefits of automated contact tracing are two-fold. Contact tracing promises to reduce the number of infections by being able to: 1) systematically identify all of those that have been in contact with someone who has had COVID; and, 2) ensure those that have been exposed to the virus do not unknowingly infect others. 

“COVI” is the name of a recent contact tracing app developed by Mila and was proposed to help combat COVID-19 in Canada. The app was designed to inform each individual of their relative risk of being infected with the virus, which Mila claimed would empower citizens to make informed decisions about their movement and allow for a data-driven approach to public health policy; all the while ensuring data is safeguarded from governments, companies, and individuals.  

This article will provide a critical response to Mila’s COVI White Paper. Specifically, this article will discuss: the extent to which diversity has been considered in the design of the app, assumptions surrounding users’ interaction with the app and the app’s utility, as well as unanswered questions surrounding transparency, accountability, and security.

We see this as an opportunity to supplement the excellent risk analysis done by the COVI team to surface insights that can be applied to other contact- and proximity-tracing apps that are being developed and deployed across the world. Our hope is that, through a meaningful dialogue, we can ultimately help organizations develop better solutions that respect the fundamental rights and values of the communities these solutions are meant to serve.

Full paper in PDF formDownload
Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

🔍 SEARCH

Spotlight

AI Policy Corner: AI for Good Summit 2025

AI Policy Corner: Japan’s AI Promotion Act

AI Policy Corner: Texas and New York: Comparing U.S. State-Level AI Laws

What is Sovereign Artificial Intelligence?

AI Policy Corner: The Kenya National AI Strategy

related posts

  • Response to Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada Consultation Proposals pertaining to amendm...

    Response to Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada Consultation Proposals pertaining to amendm...

  • Montreal AI Symposium Presentation at Polytechnique

    Montreal AI Symposium Presentation at Polytechnique

  • AI Ethics: Inclusivity in Smart Cities

    AI Ethics: Inclusivity in Smart Cities

  • Response to the AHRC and WEF regarding Responsible Innovation in AI

    Response to the AHRC and WEF regarding Responsible Innovation in AI

  • Probing Networked Agency: Where is the Locus of Moral Responsibility?

    Probing Networked Agency: Where is the Locus of Moral Responsibility?

  • The Social Contract for AI

    The Social Contract for AI

  • How Naysan Saran disrupted water quality detection in one hackathon

    How Naysan Saran disrupted water quality detection in one hackathon

  • Response to the European Commission’s white paper on AI (2020)

    Response to the European Commission’s white paper on AI (2020)

  • Andrew Ng’s AI For Everyone - The Definitive Starting Block for AI Novices

    Andrew Ng’s AI For Everyone - The Definitive Starting Block for AI Novices

  • What has been published about ethical and social science considerations regarding the pandemic outbr...

    What has been published about ethical and social science considerations regarding the pandemic outbr...

Partners

  •  
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer

Categories


• Blog
• Research Summaries
• Columns
• Core Principles of Responsible AI
• Special Topics

Signature Content


• The State Of AI Ethics

• The Living Dictionary

• The AI Ethics Brief

Learn More


• About

• Open Access Policy

• Contributions Policy

• Editorial Stance on AI Tools

• Press

• Donate

• Contact

The AI Ethics Brief (bi-weekly newsletter)

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.


Archive

  • © MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE. All rights reserved 2024.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.