• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Core Principles of Responsible AI
    • Accountability
    • Fairness
    • Privacy
    • Safety and Security
    • Sustainability
    • Transparency
  • Special Topics
    • AI in Industry
    • Ethical Implications
    • Human-Centered Design
    • Regulatory Landscape
    • Technical Methods
  • Living Dictionary
  • State of AI Ethics
  • AI Ethics Brief
  • 🇫🇷
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

From Dance App to Political Mercenary: How disinformation on TikTok gaslights political tensions in Kenya

June 19, 2022

🔬 Research summary by Connor Wright, our Partnerships Manager.

[Original paper by Mozilla]


Overview: The upcoming Kenyan elections on August 9th will be one of the hottest events in 2022 within the African context. Yet, disinformation’s role on TikTok’s platform is proving far too prominent.


Introduction

The upcoming Kenyan elections on August 9th will be one of the hottest events in 2022 within the African context, with previous elections having caused violence and heightened tribal tensions. Consequently, disinformation has been rife on social media platforms, with Tik Tok being largely unscrutinised having just entered the social media scene. Hence,  this is Tik Tok’s first real litmus test in Africa, with its prominence having shaken up the previous Kenyan social media landscape dominated by Facebook and Twitter. However, the report finds that it is failing this test, with disinformation proving vivid and far too compelling.

Key Insights

The report

Mozilla investigated a sample of inappropriate political content taken from Tik Tok in Kenya: 130 videos and 33 different accounts, amassing over 4 million views. The hashtags #siasa and #siasazakenya (which translate to “politics” and “Kenyan politics,” respectively) have over 20 million views on the platform, showing the sheer amount of potential content to be analysed.

In sum, the “research suggests that Kenyan TikTok has become a breeding ground for propaganda, hate speech, and disinformation about Kenya’s election.” (p. 5). To arrive at this conclusion, the content was parsed into two different categories: (1) hate speech and incitement against communities; and (2) synthetic and manipulated content (P. 6).

  1. Actors are praying on the fears of many Kenyans of post-election violence, which brought life to a standstill in 2007. These messages were explicit, including targeting specific tribes and eliminating them from Kenya.
  2. Given the vast proliferation of disinformation, Kenyans cannot trust news outlets or social media to spread unbiased information.

Context bias

An explanation as to why such information is allowed to persist can be found in context bias. Here, content moderators were often subjected to content in different languages and with unknown figures involved. Hence, problematic content was allowed to fester due to a lack of appropriate contextual knowledge, which, to the untrained eye, may not be seen as an issue. Furthermore, time and quota pressure for content moderators means they aren’t always able to moderate a video properly, having to watch some videos at high speeds instead.

Within this disinformation-heavy landscape, flashbacks to 2017 when smear campaigns by both presidential candidates took place over the internet also result. This is highly worrying for young people who are still forming their political identities yet are heavily involved with Tik Tok.

Ways forward

The report lists some steps to take to combat the issue at hand. These pieces of advice generally encompass the following:

  • Establishing partnerships with local authorities in the country to better understand the gravity of the situation in Kenya and the importance of these elections.
  • Potentially consider turning off group elements of the platform and trending sections such as the For You Page, as Facebook and Twitter have decided to do.

Between the lines

From my perspective, this situation is yet another example of the importance of diversity in big tech. Given how content moderators have to evaluate videos in a different language, there will always be content that slips through. To best neutralise this effect will be to consult and engage with those who know the Kenyan context. Especially in situations like these, we cannot walk in another’s shoes, meaning our next best move is to involve these types of perspectives. In other words, instead of working for African nations, we should work with them.

Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

🔍 SEARCH

Spotlight

AI Policy Corner: Singapore’s National AI Strategy 2.0

AI Governance in a Competitive World: Balancing Innovation, Regulation and Ethics | Point Zero Forum 2025

AI Policy Corner: Frontier AI Safety Commitments, AI Seoul Summit 2024

AI Policy Corner: The Colorado State Deepfakes Act

Special Edition: Honouring the Legacy of Abhishek Gupta (1992–2024)

related posts

  • Research Summary: Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples

    Research Summary: Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples

  • Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparency

    Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparency

  • Friend or foe? Exploring the implications of large language models on the science system

    Friend or foe? Exploring the implications of large language models on the science system

  • Responsibility assignment won’t solve the moral issues of artificial intelligence

    Responsibility assignment won’t solve the moral issues of artificial intelligence

  • Research Summary: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks

    Research Summary: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks

  • Research summary: Detecting Misinformation on WhatsApp without Breaking Encryption

    Research summary: Detecting Misinformation on WhatsApp without Breaking Encryption

  • Corporate Governance of Artificial Intelligence in the Public Interest

    Corporate Governance of Artificial Intelligence in the Public Interest

  • Research summary: Bring the People Back In: Contesting Benchmark Machine Learning

    Research summary: Bring the People Back In: Contesting Benchmark Machine Learning

  • The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Research

    The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Research

  • CodeAid: Evaluating a Classroom Deployment of an LLM-based Programming Assistant that Balances Stude...

    CodeAid: Evaluating a Classroom Deployment of an LLM-based Programming Assistant that Balances Stude...

Partners

  •  
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer

Categories


• Blog
• Research Summaries
• Columns
• Core Principles of Responsible AI
• Special Topics

Signature Content


• The State Of AI Ethics

• The Living Dictionary

• The AI Ethics Brief

Learn More


• About

• Open Access Policy

• Contributions Policy

• Editorial Stance on AI Tools

• Press

• Donate

• Contact

The AI Ethics Brief (bi-weekly newsletter)

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.


Archive

  • © MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE. All rights reserved 2024.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.