• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Core Principles of Responsible AI
    • Accountability
    • Fairness
    • Privacy
    • Safety and Security
    • Sustainability
    • Transparency
  • Special Topics
    • AI in Industry
    • Ethical Implications
    • Human-Centered Design
    • Regulatory Landscape
    • Technical Methods
  • Living Dictionary
  • State of AI Ethics
  • AI Ethics Brief
  • šŸ‡«šŸ‡·
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

Digital transformation and the renewal of social theory: Unpacking the new fraudulent myths and misplaced metaphors

October 4, 2021

šŸ”¬ Research summary by Connor Wright, our Partnerships Manager.

[Original paper by Marinus Ossewaarde]


Overview: With the emergence of technology, society has changed immeasurably. Questioning the status quo has become less of a pressing issue in favour of continuing to use a digital service. However, reflection is one of the most critical skills in preventing a digital future guided and dominated by the few.


Introduction

The lives of many have become densely linked with technology. The digital transformation is being led and developed by certain parties (labelled as the ā€œgooglizationā€ of everything). Hence, social theory must adapt to the dominant economic and digital spheres, promoted and sustained through different technological ā€œmythsā€. To do so, acknowledging the status quo and advocating the importance of questioning will prove essential in both understanding and combating digital domination by the few. Up first is acknowledgement.

Key Insights

Digital and physical life have become inseparable

The reality we live in is becoming more and more recognised as inextricably linked with the digital space. The influence technology possesses often goes unnoticed until it is briefly taken away. Such influence is so strong that users readily accept the missions of businesses to continue using their services (especially when accepting the role that technology plays in our lives has led to the subsequent domination of digitalisation.

The domination of digitalisation

The information available through tech has ended up in its economisation. Less thinking and more simply accepting is the easiest way to drive profit, reducing the value of mental activities such as reflection. Whereas previously, society has been driven by the political and religious spheres of life, the economic sphere has overtaken them thanks to digital transformation. Through this, the few driving the transformation can dictate the game’s rules as to what this digital transformation will look like. The changes undergone do not bode well for the academic sphere.

The consequences for intellectual practices

With digitalisation as the driver behind the dominant economic sphere, academic work becomes valued when it adopts the norms and language of the prevailing economic sphere. Such dominance then makes it difficult to imagine alternative scenarios to the reality in which we find ourselves. Instead of being encouraged to think, the mind is being used as an instrument of power rather than being critical. The ability of art and science to influence the mind gets weaker as this conditioning goes on while increasing the passive acceptance of the status quo. It is through this lack of questioning that ā€œfakeā€ myths can be developed.

ā€œGenuineā€ vs ā€œfakeā€ myths

In contrast to a ā€œfakeā€ myth, a ā€œgenuineā€ myth leads to enlightenment through insights and a deeper understanding of the current state of affairs. The authors use Homer’s myths in the Odyssey as some examples. On the other hand, a ā€œfakeā€ myth doesn’t lead to enlightenment and is instead manufactured to reinforce the status quo. The fabrication is designed to blindfold the public so that they adhere to the status quo without question. One such example presented by the authors is Silicon Valley being lauded as the digital revolution heroes.

The digital myth

A reason Silicon Valley is seen in this way owes to how digitalisation is seen as bringing new enlightenment to the fore, making everyone more ready to accept whatever form it comes in. Promises of a new technological reality are made to condition how the public sees technology casting aside other potential realities to preserve the status quo. How this is done can be seen in the use of metaphors.

The use of metaphors

The digital reality desired by those at the helm of the technological reality is argued to utilise language to maintain the current state of affairs. Metaphors such as ā€œdata miningā€ and ā€œthe cloudā€ are employed but are inappropriate as they make data sound like a natural resource. Even metaphors such as ā€œdigital communityā€ distracts from how communities are built on face-to-face interactions. Hence, again, the deep interaction between digital and physical reality comes through, subtly adjusting how we express ourselves and view technology itself.

Between the lines

I find how our use of language is also influenced by the technology we use very intriguing indeed. Similar occurrences can be seen in the anthropomorphic language used to describe AI at times, especially with self-driving cars being described as ā€˜making decisions’. I also see how big corporations spin their own take on reality often undetected. As a result, the importance of building up civic competence shines even brighter. Should we choose to stop asking questions, those who dictate the space will stop giving answers and there remain many unanswered questions yet.

Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

šŸ” SEARCH

Spotlight

Beyond Consultation: Building Inclusive AI Governance for Canada’s Democratic Future

AI Policy Corner: U.S. Executive Order on Advancing AI Education for American Youth

AI Policy Corner: U.S. Copyright Guidance on Works Created with AI

AI Policy Corner: AI for Good Summit 2025

AI Policy Corner: Japan’s AI Promotion Act

related posts

  • Getting from Commitment to Content in AI and Data Ethics: Justice and Explainability

    Getting from Commitment to Content in AI and Data Ethics: Justice and Explainability

  • The Challenge of Understanding What Users Want: Inconsistent Preferences and Engagement Optimization

    The Challenge of Understanding What Users Want: Inconsistent Preferences and Engagement Optimization

  • Selecting Privacy-Enhancing Technologies for Managing Health Data Use

    Selecting Privacy-Enhancing Technologies for Managing Health Data Use

  • Why AI Ethics Is a Critical Theory

    Why AI Ethics Is a Critical Theory

  • A hunt for the Snark: Annotator Diversity in Data Practices

    A hunt for the Snark: Annotator Diversity in Data Practices

  • Structured access to AI capabilities: an emerging paradigm for safe AI deployment

    Structured access to AI capabilities: an emerging paradigm for safe AI deployment

  • Exploring Clusters of Research in Three Areas of AI Safety

    Exploring Clusters of Research in Three Areas of AI Safety

  • Responsible and Regulatory Conform Machine Learning for Medicine: A Survey of Challenges and Solutio...

    Responsible and Regulatory Conform Machine Learning for Medicine: A Survey of Challenges and Solutio...

  • Algorithmic Harms in Child Welfare: Uncertainties in Practice, Organization, and Street-level Decisi...

    Algorithmic Harms in Child Welfare: Uncertainties in Practice, Organization, and Street-level Decisi...

  • The E.U.’s Artificial Intelligence Act: An Ordoliberal Assessment

    The E.U.’s Artificial Intelligence Act: An Ordoliberal Assessment

Partners

  • Ā 
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer

Categories


• Blog
• Research Summaries
• Columns
• Core Principles of Responsible AI
• Special Topics

Signature Content


• The State Of AI Ethics

• The Living Dictionary

• The AI Ethics Brief

Learn More


• About

• Open Access Policy

• Contributions Policy

• Editorial Stance on AI Tools

• Press

• Donate

• Contact

The AI Ethics Brief (bi-weekly newsletter)

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.


Archive

  • Ā© 2025 MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.