• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

  • Articles
    • Public Policy
    • Privacy & Security
    • Human Rights
      • Ethics
      • JEDI (Justice, Equity, Diversity, Inclusion
    • Climate
    • Design
      • Emerging Technology
    • Application & Adoption
      • Health
      • Education
      • Government
        • Military
        • Public Works
      • Labour
    • Arts & Culture
      • Film & TV
      • Music
      • Pop Culture
      • Digital Art
  • Columns
    • AI Policy Corner
    • Recess
    • Tech Futures
  • The AI Ethics Brief
  • AI Literacy
    • Research Summaries
    • AI Ethics Living Dictionary
    • Learning Community
  • The State of AI Ethics Report
    • Volume 7 (November 2025)
    • Volume 6 (February 2022)
    • Volume 5 (July 2021)
    • Volume 4 (April 2021)
    • Volume 3 (Jan 2021)
    • Volume 2 (Oct 2020)
    • Volume 1 (June 2020)
  • About
    • Our Contributions Policy
    • Our Open Access Policy
    • Contact
    • Donate

Blending Brushstrokes with Bytes: My Artistic Odyssey from Analog to AI

December 24, 2023

✍️ Column by Venus Krier, a freelance illustrator and animator.


Overview: In this intricate tapestry of artistry and technology, I chart my transformative journey from the tactile world of analog art to the boundless realms of digital creation and AI integration. Embracing the unpredictable allure of wet-on-wet ink techniques, I harmonize them with the precision of digital tools, crafting a visual language that parallels my evolving understanding of AI’s role in art. This narrative isn’t just about adapting to new tools; it’s a deeper exploration of how AI, while streamlining certain aspects of creativity, also challenges the traditional notions of artistic growth, learning, and the very essence of time in the creative process.


After a recent career change, I redirected myself back to art. Since then, I’ve freelanced, specializing in animation, illustrations, and graphic design. This journey has been a transformative experience, as I’ve learned to appreciate and employ a combination of analog and digital techniques in my work. Often, in my animations, I paint with analog techniques. One that I particularly like is wet on wet ink, giving its unpredictable and less controllable effect. I then scanned them and used digital software to draw very crisp lines over them. Both techniques combined create visually interesting outcomes; in a way, this lens nicely illustrates how I understand the usefulness of AI.  

As I was still transitioning away from my previous career, I’ve had to learn and adapt to a variety of digital tools over the years, such as those from the Adobe suite; this was a bit of a challenge, as for the previous decade I had always focused on analog media such as paintings or collages. I initially hesitated to use software, but I quickly realized the possibilities they offered to expand my creative horizons. I’ve since tried to adopt a similar approach to AI: I don’t see it as a way of automating my work away but as enabling and allowing a wide variety of tools to help me refine my work, find inspiration, learn how to use new software or troubleshoot technical problems in my work. 

What truly makes my job fascinating are the constant challenges and the continuous learning it entails. Working through the creative process, I discover unexpected paths and problems to solve, acquiring additional knowledge along the way; errors sometimes lead to serendipity. This journey culminates in the immense satisfaction of creating and completing pieces. Often, when I initiate a project with a specific idea in mind, the final result becomes far more intriguing and diverse as it evolves through the many dilemmas I encounter along the way. In fact, the result often differs from the original idea; in the creation process, I also ask myself, “What knowledge or skills am I lacking? How could I achieve this another way? What if I tried this particular approach?” These challenges force me to learn additional skills and programs, which, in return, enable me to create more and more diverse projects. 

AI can play a role in answering these questions, but overreliance sometimes leads to standardized outcomes – there is clearly a skill to be developed in how to use these tools and when to use them. While AI models can streamline time-consuming tasks and afford more time for exploration and creative experimentation – immediate rectifications and solutions may come at the cost of true reflection. Perhaps we lose some value by no longer benefitting from the process of trial and error. 

While AI and Art are often associated with MidJourney DALL-E, etc, other AI tools, such as ChatGPT, have proven highly useful too. As a freelancer, they allow me more time to focus on my work rather than administrative tasks: for instance, the creation of contracts, refining grant applications, reducing reliance on accountants or marketing, and so on. This may seem obvious, but such tasks sometimes take up much time. People are sometimes reluctant to try new technologies, but I think it’s important for artists to see how they can use them to their advantage. 

Having said that, I can’t help but harbor concerns about its potential impact on jobs and the ethical questions surrounding its use in the long run. If my work can ultimately be replicated on end by a cheaper digital replica, what incentives do I have to make this my career? Ultimately, my apprehension stems from the concern that AI compromises the essence of time. Time is a crucial element in the artistic process. Where is the pleasure or enrichment when something can be created in a matter of seconds? Even as an artist, one becomes more proficient and efficient with technical and motor skills over time, enabling greater creativity. However, the process of learning, practice, and the passage of time fosters this growth. I fear that the expectation to work at an accelerated pace may diminish the intrinsic value of artistry. AI’s rapid ability to replicate will deprive individuals of the time needed to learn and make mistakes and push impatient clients to rely solely on AI tools. This might not necessarily be the case; in this fast-paced environment, perhaps people will seek out more “hand-made” art. Many want to express their individuality by having unique pieces, much like the current trend in handcrafted furniture and clothing, where handmade often resonate with unique and quality products. 

Lastly, issues related to copyright and the appropriation of others’ work without consent remain unresolved. There is hope that some initiatives, like watermarking and ‘opt-outs,’ will be implemented in the art industry. There are already many artistic platforms addressing this issue – see, for example, the resources listed on Roxana Lapa’s website, a digital artist and designer who has written about The Impact of AI Art on the Creative Industry. 

To conclude, the only way forward is not to resist this technology but to help shape it to fit our needs. This can take the form of novel tools, better regulations, and the enforcement of copyright laws. Artists should not shun AI completely. Adapting to new technologies is difficult, but the rewards can be enormous if done well.

Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

🔍 SEARCH

Spotlight

Illustration of a coral reef ecosystem

Tech Futures: Diversity of Thought and Experience: The UN’s Scientific Panel on AI

This image shows a large white, traditional, old building. The top half of the building represents the humanities (which is symbolised by the embedded text from classic literature which is faintly shown ontop the building). The bottom section of the building is embossed with mathematical formulas to represent the sciences. The middle layer of the image is heavily pixelated. On the steps at the front of the building there is a group of scholars, wearing formal suits and tie attire, who are standing around at the enternace talking and some of them are sitting on the steps. There are two stone, statute-like hands that are stretching the building apart from the left side. In the forefront of the image, there are 8 students - which can only be seen from the back. Their graduation gowns have bright blue hoods and they all look as though they are walking towards the old building which is in the background at a distance. There are a mix of students in the foreground.

Tech Futures: Co-opting Research and Education

Agentic AI systems and algorithmic accountability: a new era of e-commerce

ALL IN Conference 2025: Four Key Takeaways from Montreal

Beyond Dependency: The Hidden Risk of Social Comparison in Chatbot Companionship

related posts

  • On the Creativity of Large Language Models

    On the Creativity of Large Language Models

  • Declaration on the ethics of brain-computer interfaces and augment intelligence

    Declaration on the ethics of brain-computer interfaces and augment intelligence

  • Research summary: Snapshot Series: Facial Recognition Technology

    Research summary: Snapshot Series: Facial Recognition Technology

  • On Prediction-Modelers and Decision-Makers: Why Fairness Requires More Than a Fair Prediction Model

    On Prediction-Modelers and Decision-Makers: Why Fairness Requires More Than a Fair Prediction Model

  • The Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) Joins the AI Alliance

    The Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) Joins the AI Alliance

  • Meet the inaugural cohort of the MAIEI Summer Research Internship!

    Meet the inaugural cohort of the MAIEI Summer Research Internship!

  • Clueless AI: Should AI Models Report to Us When They Are Clueless?

    Clueless AI: Should AI Models Report to Us When They Are Clueless?

  • Automating Informality: On AI and Labour in the Global South (Research Summary)

    Automating Informality: On AI and Labour in the Global South (Research Summary)

  • Diagnosing Gender Bias In Image Recognition Systems (Research Summary)

    Diagnosing Gender Bias In Image Recognition Systems (Research Summary)

  • Mapping the Design Space of Human-AI Interaction in Text Summarization

    Mapping the Design Space of Human-AI Interaction in Text Summarization

Partners

  •  
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer


Articles

Columns

AI Literacy

The State of AI Ethics Report


 

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.

Contact

Donate


  • © 2025 MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.