• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Core Principles of Responsible AI
    • Accountability
    • Fairness
    • Privacy
    • Safety and Security
    • Sustainability
    • Transparency
  • Special Topics
    • AI in Industry
    • Ethical Implications
    • Human-Centered Design
    • Regulatory Landscape
    • Technical Methods
  • Living Dictionary
  • State of AI Ethics
  • AI Ethics Brief
  • šŸ‡«šŸ‡·
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

Artificial Intelligence and Inequality in the Middle East: The Political Economy of Inclusion

June 23, 2021

šŸ”¬ Research summary by Connor Wright, our Partnerships Manager.

[Original paper by Nagla Rizk]


Overview: The Middle East and North Africa region could prove an exciting incubator for the positive use of AI, especially given how different countries have prioritized its development. However, the tendency towards economic growth over social service improvement seems to have deprived a generally youthful population of expressing their digital literacy skills. Regional peculiarities complicate this further, requiring a conducive environment to develop AI within the region becoming ever more apparent.


Introduction

Could the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region be a promising region for AI to be used for good? Within the MENA region, AI can exacerbate current social and economic divides by concentrating power in the hands of the few but also help smaller businesses gain access to the market. Nevertheless, as a region that has not benefited from trickle-down economic policies, the multifaceted and multilayered inequality, stretching from inequality of opportunity associated with religion and class to economic inequality, has the potential to get only deeper. The improvement or worsening of this situation is tied heavily to the current data situation in the region, with the current attitude towards education and regional peculiarities complicating matters even further. 

Regional particularities

The first thing to note within this scenario is the particularities of the MENA region itself. Boasting an oasis of different cultures, dialects, and traditions, it also contains a wide-ranging scale of economic prowess and sources of income. Countries such as the UAE can dedicate more resources to the development of AI systems (even having a designated government minister to AI). In contrast, others, such as Mauritania, just don’t have the necessary means to do so. 

Nonetheless, what unites the region through a common thread is the youthful population present within each country and the relentless pursuit of tech development and economic growth being the norm. This has meant that aspects such as economic development, inclusionary practices, political participation, and other social service development have not reached the top of any political agenda. One significant cost being education.

The need for education

An overarching acknowledgment in AI is the need for specific education surrounding the area to better prepare the population for adapting to the current times. However, despite many countries within the region’s working population being included in the bracket of medium-low skilled workers (whose jobs are most at risk of automation), projects to up-skill such workers have not been fully pursued. This is certainly not the case because of a lack of digital literacy within the countries involved. Most of the populations of said countries have internet access and are familiar with its usage. 

However, such skills cannot be utilized by said populations, with mass unemployment running rampant through the region. One potential solution can be to resort to entrepreneurship to take advantage of these digital skills, but a severe lack of data accessibility amongst other factors (such as non-affordable cloud data structures) proves severely debilitating for efforts to do so.

Data inaccessibility

With the states within the region being primarily in control of the national statistics centers that harbor most of the country’s data, the lack of available open data then inhibits young entrepreneurs in these regions from being able to further their own projects. Given how most data collection is then centralized, extremely accurate local data is harder to overcome through a lack of local data repositories and initiatives. This then brings to the surface how if there is now locally centered data collection, how representative and accurate will the data be?

Data quality

With a centralized role being played by the state in these regions, there runs the risk of minority and more micro-level experiences being overlooked. For example, data being collected by the state about hard-to-reach rural communities (who do not enjoy a high level of internet access)  is unlikely to be carried out to such great lengths to compensate for the lack of access. In this sense, it is likely that the data that is being collected on these areas through the areas that are slightly more connected are then taken as representative of the whole of these regions. Certain inaccuracies about the experience of such communities can then lead to some inaccurate assumptions about what those experiences consist of. These assumptions would then be translated into the AI design itself.

The major problem is how a country-wide AI policy or usage cannot represent all thanks to the presence of these assumptions, being labeled as ā€œdata blindnessā€ in the paper. In this sense, the data is ā€˜blind’ through not fully representing the community it is being utilized to describe, contributing to a ā€œdata myopia.ā€ In this sense, the paper notes how national, aggregate-level methodologies for data collection cannot accurately reflect reality when it only reflects the existence of a particular segment of the population. 

Between the lines

It is important to note, still, that the MENA region cannot be treated as a singular entity. Various countries such as Tunisia, Jordan, and Egypt are all at different legislative stages of the AI and data process, with the uneven economic development mentioned beforehand playing a part in this. In this way, only some members of the MENA region can take advantage of implementing AI positively. For me, lacking in education or digital literacy is not the most significant problem in allowing all in the region to take advantage of AI, but the lack of opportunity to express such skills in the work environment. More investment is not to be seen as the panacea but rather the construction of an environment conducive to innovation and development that will genuinely allow the region to take off in the AI space.

Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

šŸ” SEARCH

Spotlight

AI Policy Corner: Frontier AI Safety Commitments, AI Seoul Summit 2024

AI Policy Corner: The Colorado State Deepfakes Act

Special Edition: Honouring the Legacy of Abhishek Gupta (1992–2024)

AI Policy Corner: The Turkish Artificial Intelligence Law Proposal

From Funding Crisis to AI Misuse: Critical Digital Rights Challenges from RightsCon 2025

related posts

  • Research summary: Legal Risks of Adversarial Machine Learning Research

    Research summary: Legal Risks of Adversarial Machine Learning Research

  • How Different Groups Prioritize Ethical Values for Responsible AI

    How Different Groups Prioritize Ethical Values for Responsible AI

  • Research summary: Designing for Human Rights in AI

    Research summary: Designing for Human Rights in AI

  • AI Neutrality in the Spotlight: ChatGPT’s Political Biases Revisited

    AI Neutrality in the Spotlight: ChatGPT’s Political Biases Revisited

  • Algorithmic Auditing and Social Justice: Lessons from the History of Audit Studies

    Algorithmic Auditing and Social Justice: Lessons from the History of Audit Studies

  • Exploring Antitrust and Platform Power in Generative AI

    Exploring Antitrust and Platform Power in Generative AI

  • Generative AI-Driven Storytelling: A New Era for Marketing

    Generative AI-Driven Storytelling: A New Era for Marketing

  • Data Capitalism and the User: An Exploration of Privacy Cynicism in Germany

    Data Capitalism and the User: An Exploration of Privacy Cynicism in Germany

  • Toward an Ethics of AI Belief

    Toward an Ethics of AI Belief

  • Ethics-based auditing of automated decision-making systems: intervention points and policy implicati...

    Ethics-based auditing of automated decision-making systems: intervention points and policy implicati...

Partners

  • Ā 
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer

Categories


• Blog
• Research Summaries
• Columns
• Core Principles of Responsible AI
• Special Topics

Signature Content


• The State Of AI Ethics

• The Living Dictionary

• The AI Ethics Brief

Learn More


• About

• Open Access Policy

• Contributions Policy

• Editorial Stance on AI Tools

• Press

• Donate

• Contact

The AI Ethics Brief (bi-weekly newsletter)

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.


Archive

  • Ā© MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE. All rights reserved 2024.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.