• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

  • Articles
    • Public Policy
    • Privacy & Security
    • Human Rights
      • Ethics
      • JEDI (Justice, Equity, Diversity, Inclusion
    • Climate
    • Design
      • Emerging Technology
    • Application & Adoption
      • Health
      • Education
      • Government
        • Military
        • Public Works
      • Labour
    • Arts & Culture
      • Film & TV
      • Music
      • Pop Culture
      • Digital Art
  • Columns
    • AI Policy Corner
    • Recess
    • Tech Futures
  • The AI Ethics Brief
  • AI Literacy
    • Research Summaries
    • AI Ethics Living Dictionary
    • Learning Community
  • The State of AI Ethics Report
    • Volume 7 (November 2025)
    • Volume 6 (February 2022)
    • Volume 5 (July 2021)
    • Volume 4 (April 2021)
    • Volume 3 (Jan 2021)
    • Volume 2 (Oct 2020)
    • Volume 1 (June 2020)
  • About
    • Our Contributions Policy
    • Our Open Access Policy
    • Contact
    • Donate

Towards Sustainable Conversational AI

May 15, 2022

🔬 Column by Julia Anderson, a writer and conversational UX designer exploring how technology can make us better humans.

Part of the ongoing Like Talking to a Person series


Product launches are complex. Conversational AI, like many AI products, relies on large datasets and diverse teams to bring them to the finish line. However, these product launches are often iterative, requiring future optimization to satisfy customers’ needs.

Sustainable AI is the quest to build AI systems that are as compatible for a company as it is for the people they are serving. This type of sustainability means rethinking the lifecycle of AI products so that the technology can scale while minimizing costs to consumers, society and the environment.

Without the proper mechanisms in place, today’s big product launch can become yesterday’s embarrassing mistake. Beyond maintenance costs, concerns around integration, secure data gathering and ethical design must be addressed. Creating AI that is compatible with scarce resources requires proper AI governance, collaborative research and strategic deployment.

Responsibility as a Cornerstone

Adopting artificial intelligence is appealing to businesses that want technology to guide decision-making, automate processes and save time. While the promise of AI is immense, widespread adoption is much slower in practice. To ensure seamless and scalable integration, various stakeholders must have a seat at the table to determine AI’s vision and governance.

The principles of Responsible AI may serve as a starting point for businesses that are serious about developing an AI strategy. While governance varies within organizations, it helps when the CEO or senior leader accepts responsibility of AI leadership. As responsibilities are assigned, decisions can be held accountable. The challenge then becomes how to measure success. Oftentimes, data scientists and engineers must be involved early on to clear up misunderstandings about how AI can grow alongside a company to solve its problems.

Typically, a formidable culture shift is necessary to implement a new vision. If AI isn’t trusted or understood within the organization, then its customers likely will hold similar perceptions. This is the basis of a social license. In AI a social license is the perception that the technology is using fair and transparent algorithms to benefit the markets they are operating in. For conversational AI such as in-car assistants, this could mean incorporating the objectives of not only automobile drivers, but manufacturers and regulators, as well.

Considering the perspectives of various stakeholders also means constant iteration. Rather than see AI software as “plug-and-play technology with immediate returns” companies should embrace cross-functional teams, user feedback and the reality that the first deployment won’t be the last. Before technology can scale within a business, the company must understand customer complexities as well as what data are required to create a successful experience.

Gathering the Goods

A common, and costly, pitfall is not gathering enough data. For chatbots or voice assistants, this is a limiting factor in not only how the technology understands customer problems, but how they can solve them as well. Choosing the right learning model for the problem along with using a representative training data set can reduce biases early on and yield better long-term results. Without the right model, disasters like Microsoft’s Tay, a bot that adopted the personality of a racist Internet troll, spring up.

In conversational AI, there are usually several pieces of a platform that create the end experience. For enterprise solutions, this incorporates NLP performance, backend data integration, security, data storage and more. The question of building vs. buying a platform is a crucial one, due to the high costs of switching systems later on. When an organization uses one service for speech recognition and another for dialog management, for example, another question arises: “How well can we secure our data?”

Obtaining high-quality datasets requires time and money. One way to make this easier is by using human-in-the-loop solutions. Here, humans can create and label datasets that are reviewed by the AI system and refined by humans. Biases are inevitable but could be reduced if the humans in the loop are working under responsible AI leadership.

Data privacy remains a contentious subject for users who may not understand how a company’s system shares information to deliver customer experiences. Sometimes, companies don’t understand how different elements of the system work together. While many vendors claim to have an “enterprise-ready platform” to create conversational AI solutions, this is often not the case. The secure transfer of data is one of many challenges that vendors must overcome. Once a solution is deployed, companies may feel pressured to stay with a vendor due to the complexities of switching to an alternative.

Environmental Expectations

The misallocation of computing power is a cost to the public. For one, the money necessary to train large data models is a barrier to entry for smaller firms, stifling competition and research projects. With less equitable access comes fewer opportunities to tackle community challenges.

Customer perceptions of AI products are always a factor for businesses trying to scale. Depending on the use case, people may want to solve a problem by talking to humans over conversational AI. When this finding isn’t clear to the designers or developers, then a company may have invested in the wrong solution. The inability for organizations to connect AI investments to business value hinders innovation.

Due to AI’s evolving nature, it is difficult to manage expectations of what success looks like. However, carbon efficiency is one metric being explored. Green Algorithms is one tool striving to quantify carbon footprints at a time when there are no universal standards to measure carbon impact. The Informations & Communications Technology industry, where Machine Learning and AI are fast-growing disciplines, generates about 2% of global CO₂ emissions and counting.

New solutions such as LightOn are finding ways to use less energy for complex computations using novel hardware. Crystal, a conversational AI platform, auto-classifies business requests with half the computing power of similar products. Thoughtful design paired with such innovation can bring sustainability to the forefront of AI solutions.

Conclusion

A narrow AI vision can set the stage for larger operational and ethical issues down the line. By realizing there is no one-size-fits-all approach to emerging technology, sustainable AI can be a nimble solution in a once rigid landscape.

Businesses like growth. When speed is prioritized over collaboration, however, AI deployments may not live up to expectations.

Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

🔍 SEARCH

Spotlight

An abstract spiral of dark circles appears at the centre, resembling a tornado. Several vintage magazine covers and advertisements are being drawn toward the spiral. The artworks that have already been pulled into it are becoming distorted and replaced with clusters of numbers representing their numerical embeddings.

Tech Futures: Better Imagination for Better Tech Futures

This image is a collage with a colourful Japanese vintage landscape showing a mountain, hills, flowers and other plants and a small stream. There are 3 large black data servers placed in the bottom half of the image, with a cloud of black smoke emitting from them, partly obscuring the scenery.

Tech Futures: Crafting Participatory Tech Futures

A network diagram with lots of little emojis, organised in clusters.

Tech Futures: AI For and Against Knowledge

A brightly coloured illustration which can be viewed in any direction. It has many elements to it working together: men in suits around a table, someone in a data centre, big hands controlling the scenes and holding a phone, people in a production line. Motifs such as network diagrams and melting emojis are placed throughout the busy vignettes.

Tech Futures: The Fossil Fuels Playbook for Big Tech: Part II

A rock embedded with intricate circuit board patterns, held delicately by pale hands drawn in a ghostly style. The contrast between the rough, metallic mineral and the sleek, artificial circuit board illustrates the relationship between raw natural resources and modern technological development. The hands evoke human involvement in the extraction and manufacturing processes.

Tech Futures: The Fossil Fuels Playbook for Big Tech: Part I

related posts

  • Conformity Assessments and Post-market Monitoring: A Guide to the Role of Auditing in the Proposed E...

    Conformity Assessments and Post-market Monitoring: A Guide to the Role of Auditing in the Proposed E...

  • A technical study on the feasibility of using proxy methods for algorithmic bias monitoring in a pri...

    A technical study on the feasibility of using proxy methods for algorithmic bias monitoring in a pri...

  • Computer Vision’s implications for human autonomy

    Computer Vision’s implications for human autonomy

  • Sociological Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence: A Typological Reading

    Sociological Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence: A Typological Reading

  • Broadening the Algorithm Auditing Lens to Investigate Targeted Advertising

    Broadening the Algorithm Auditing Lens to Investigate Targeted Advertising

  • Friend or foe? Exploring the implications of large language models on the science system

    Friend or foe? Exploring the implications of large language models on the science system

  • Exploiting The Right: Inferring Ideological Alignment in Online Influence Campaigns Using Shared Ima...

    Exploiting The Right: Inferring Ideological Alignment in Online Influence Campaigns Using Shared Ima...

  • Target specification bias, counterfactual prediction, and algorithmic fairness in healthcare

    Target specification bias, counterfactual prediction, and algorithmic fairness in healthcare

  • Understanding Toxicity Triggers on Reddit in the Context of Singapore

    Understanding Toxicity Triggers on Reddit in the Context of Singapore

  • Self-Improving Diffusion Models with Synthetic Data

    Self-Improving Diffusion Models with Synthetic Data

Partners

  •  
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer


Articles

Columns

AI Literacy

The State of AI Ethics Report


 

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.

Contact

Donate


  • © 2025 MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.