• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

  • Articles
    • Public Policy
    • Privacy & Security
    • Human Rights
      • Ethics
      • JEDI (Justice, Equity, Diversity, Inclusion
    • Climate
    • Design
      • Emerging Technology
    • Application & Adoption
      • Health
      • Education
      • Government
        • Military
        • Public Works
      • Labour
    • Arts & Culture
      • Film & TV
      • Music
      • Pop Culture
      • Digital Art
  • Columns
    • AI Policy Corner
    • Recess
    • Tech Futures
  • The AI Ethics Brief
  • AI Literacy
    • Research Summaries
    • AI Ethics Living Dictionary
    • Learning Community
  • The State of AI Ethics Report
    • Volume 7 (November 2025)
    • Volume 6 (February 2022)
    • Volume 5 (July 2021)
    • Volume 4 (April 2021)
    • Volume 3 (Jan 2021)
    • Volume 2 (Oct 2020)
    • Volume 1 (June 2020)
  • About
    • Our Contributions Policy
    • Our Open Access Policy
    • Contact
    • Donate

The MAIEI Learning Community Report (September 2021)

September 21, 2021

Download  Full report in PDF form

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter for the latest AI ethics research & reporting.

Welcome to this special report from the Montreal AI Ethics Institute!

This is a labor of the Learning Community cohort that was convened by MAIEI in Winter 2021 to work through and discuss important research issues in the field of AI ethics from a multidisciplinary lens. The community came together supported by facilitators from the MAIEI staff to vigorously debate and explore the nuances of issues like bias, privacy, disinformation, accountability, and more especially examining them from the perspective of industry, civil society, academia, and government.

From its inception, the MAIEI LC community sought to combine both learning and communication. Learning was taken in the form of a wide range of topics over the 8-weeks, covering topics like the rise of emotional systems all the way to digital labor. Communication then came in the form of LC participants sharing their thoughts with fellow participants and coordinators. What made this even more noteworthy was sheer interdisciplinarity of the group.

With a wealth of talented applications to choose from in the beginning, the team at MAIEI knew this was going to be an intellectually stimulating and riveting 8-weeks. The backgrounds included ranged from political, to legal and minority expertise. With our participants also spread all over the world, the wealth of diversity in experience and how beneficial this can be to the AI process, was extremely apparent. Whether it be talking about connectivity issues in Mexico or recent issues in Ukraine, we were all able to learn about topics previously unknown to some of us. It was with great sadness that the shared learning space came to an end, but we couldn’t just leave what we learnt confined to the Zoom room. Thus, the MAIEI LC report was born.

The outcome of these discussions is reflected in the report that you are reading now – an exploration of a variety of issues with deep-dive, critical commentary on what has been done, what worked and what didn’t, and what remains to be done so that we can meaningfully move forward in addressing the societal challenges posed by the deployment of AI systems.

The chapters titled

  • “Design and Techno-isolationism”,
  • “Facebook and the Digital Divide: Perspectives from Myanmar, Mexico, and India”,
  • “Future of Work”, and
  • “Media & Communications & Ethical Foresight”

will hopefully provide with you novel lenses to explore this domain beyond the usual tropes that are covered in the domain of AI ethics.

The cohort was an absolute delight and the interactions of both the staff and the community brought together a unique, irreplaceable experience that is reflected in the following pages. If you’d like to learn more about such programs, I encourage you to sign up for The AI Ethics Brief.

Enjoy these pages and please do stay in touch!

The contributors:

  • Victoria Martín del Campo, Department Chief, Mexico Data Strategy and Digital transformation office.
  • Yurii Haidai, Investigator, Business Ombudsman of Ukraine.
  • Nanditha Narayanamoorthy, Fourth-year doctoral candidate, Department of Humanities, York University, Toronto, Canada
  • Lujain Ibrahim, Schwarzman Scholar, Master’s in Global Affairs, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
  • Heather von Stackelberg, Writer, instructional designer and educator, intersection of science, technology and society.
  • Shreyasha Paudel, independent researcher, ethical and social impact of automation, digitization and data in Nepal
  • Sofia Trejo, Professor ,Department of Mathematics, Mexico’s Autonomous Institute of Technology (ITAM)
  • Christina Isaicu, Management team, AI4Good Lab
  • Wilson Lee, Senior Machine Learning Research Engineer at The Trevor Project
  • Mitchel Fleming, Graduate; McGill Faculty of Law, articling student with Bereskin & Parr Toronto.
  • Samuel Curtis, AI Policy Researcher & Project Manager at The Future Society.
  • Brittany Wills, Software engineer, Twitter’s Machine Learning Ethics, Transparency, and Accountability team.
  • Garima Batra, Software engineer and designer, Master’s in Information science University of Toronto.
  • Matthew Hutson, Freelance science and technology writer, Contributing Writer, The New Yorker.
  • Tiziana Zevallos, Design Researcher at All In.

Download  Full report in PDF form
Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

🔍 SEARCH

Spotlight

This image is a collage with a colourful Japanese vintage landscape showing a mountain, hills, flowers and other plants and a small stream. There are 3 large black data servers placed in the bottom half of the image, with a cloud of black smoke emitting from them, partly obscuring the scenery.

Tech Futures: Crafting Participatory Tech Futures

A network diagram with lots of little emojis, organised in clusters.

Tech Futures: AI For and Against Knowledge

A brightly coloured illustration which can be viewed in any direction. It has many elements to it working together: men in suits around a table, someone in a data centre, big hands controlling the scenes and holding a phone, people in a production line. Motifs such as network diagrams and melting emojis are placed throughout the busy vignettes.

Tech Futures: The Fossil Fuels Playbook for Big Tech: Part II

A rock embedded with intricate circuit board patterns, held delicately by pale hands drawn in a ghostly style. The contrast between the rough, metallic mineral and the sleek, artificial circuit board illustrates the relationship between raw natural resources and modern technological development. The hands evoke human involvement in the extraction and manufacturing processes.

Tech Futures: The Fossil Fuels Playbook for Big Tech: Part I

Close-up of a cat sleeping on a computer keyboard

Tech Futures: The threat of AI-generated code to the world’s digital infrastructure

related posts

  • Artificial Intelligence and Aesthetic Judgment

    Artificial Intelligence and Aesthetic Judgment

  • Responsible sourcing and the professionalization of data work

    Responsible sourcing and the professionalization of data work

  • Cleaning Up the Streets: Understanding Motivations, Mental Models, and Concerns of Users Flagging So...

    Cleaning Up the Streets: Understanding Motivations, Mental Models, and Concerns of Users Flagging So...

  • The Challenge of Understanding What Users Want: Inconsistent Preferences and Engagement Optimization

    The Challenge of Understanding What Users Want: Inconsistent Preferences and Engagement Optimization

  • Unpacking Human-AI interaction (HAII) in safety-critical industries

    Unpacking Human-AI interaction (HAII) in safety-critical industries

  • Ubuntu’s Implications for Philosophical Ethics

    Ubuntu’s Implications for Philosophical Ethics

  • The Limits of Global Inclusion in AI Development (Research Summary)

    The Limits of Global Inclusion in AI Development (Research Summary)

  • Can Large Language Models Provide Security & Privacy Advice? Measuring the Ability of LLMs to Re...

    Can Large Language Models Provide Security & Privacy Advice? Measuring the Ability of LLMs to Re...

  • Responsible and Regulatory Conform Machine Learning for Medicine: A Survey of Challenges and Solutio...

    Responsible and Regulatory Conform Machine Learning for Medicine: A Survey of Challenges and Solutio...

  • Government AI Readiness 2021 Index

    Government AI Readiness 2021 Index

Partners

  •  
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer


Articles

Columns

AI Literacy

The State of AI Ethics Report


 

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.

Contact

Donate


  • © 2025 MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.