• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

  • Articles
    • Public Policy
    • Privacy & Security
    • Human Rights
      • Ethics
      • JEDI (Justice, Equity, Diversity, Inclusion
    • Climate
    • Design
      • Emerging Technology
    • Application & Adoption
      • Health
      • Education
      • Government
        • Military
        • Public Works
      • Labour
    • Arts & Culture
      • Film & TV
      • Music
      • Pop Culture
      • Digital Art
  • Columns
    • AI Policy Corner
    • Recess
    • Tech Futures
  • The AI Ethics Brief
  • AI Literacy
    • Research Summaries
    • AI Ethics Living Dictionary
    • Learning Community
  • The State of AI Ethics Report
    • Volume 7 (November 2025)
    • Volume 6 (February 2022)
    • Volume 5 (July 2021)
    • Volume 4 (April 2021)
    • Volume 3 (Jan 2021)
    • Volume 2 (Oct 2020)
    • Volume 1 (June 2020)
  • About
    • Our Contributions Policy
    • Our Open Access Policy
    • Contact
    • Donate

The MAIEI Learning Community Report (September 2021)

September 21, 2021

Download  Full report in PDF form

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter for the latest AI ethics research & reporting.

Welcome to this special report from the Montreal AI Ethics Institute!

This is a labor of the Learning Community cohort that was convened by MAIEI in Winter 2021 to work through and discuss important research issues in the field of AI ethics from a multidisciplinary lens. The community came together supported by facilitators from the MAIEI staff to vigorously debate and explore the nuances of issues like bias, privacy, disinformation, accountability, and more especially examining them from the perspective of industry, civil society, academia, and government.

From its inception, the MAIEI LC community sought to combine both learning and communication. Learning was taken in the form of a wide range of topics over the 8-weeks, covering topics like the rise of emotional systems all the way to digital labor. Communication then came in the form of LC participants sharing their thoughts with fellow participants and coordinators. What made this even more noteworthy was sheer interdisciplinarity of the group.

With a wealth of talented applications to choose from in the beginning, the team at MAIEI knew this was going to be an intellectually stimulating and riveting 8-weeks. The backgrounds included ranged from political, to legal and minority expertise. With our participants also spread all over the world, the wealth of diversity in experience and how beneficial this can be to the AI process, was extremely apparent. Whether it be talking about connectivity issues in Mexico or recent issues in Ukraine, we were all able to learn about topics previously unknown to some of us. It was with great sadness that the shared learning space came to an end, but we couldn’t just leave what we learnt confined to the Zoom room. Thus, the MAIEI LC report was born.

The outcome of these discussions is reflected in the report that you are reading now – an exploration of a variety of issues with deep-dive, critical commentary on what has been done, what worked and what didn’t, and what remains to be done so that we can meaningfully move forward in addressing the societal challenges posed by the deployment of AI systems.

The chapters titled

  • “Design and Techno-isolationism”,
  • “Facebook and the Digital Divide: Perspectives from Myanmar, Mexico, and India”,
  • “Future of Work”, and
  • “Media & Communications & Ethical Foresight”

will hopefully provide with you novel lenses to explore this domain beyond the usual tropes that are covered in the domain of AI ethics.

The cohort was an absolute delight and the interactions of both the staff and the community brought together a unique, irreplaceable experience that is reflected in the following pages. If you’d like to learn more about such programs, I encourage you to sign up for The AI Ethics Brief.

Enjoy these pages and please do stay in touch!

The contributors:

  • Victoria Martín del Campo, Department Chief, Mexico Data Strategy and Digital transformation office.
  • Yurii Haidai, Investigator, Business Ombudsman of Ukraine.
  • Nanditha Narayanamoorthy, Fourth-year doctoral candidate, Department of Humanities, York University, Toronto, Canada
  • Lujain Ibrahim, Schwarzman Scholar, Master’s in Global Affairs, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
  • Heather von Stackelberg, Writer, instructional designer and educator, intersection of science, technology and society.
  • Shreyasha Paudel, independent researcher, ethical and social impact of automation, digitization and data in Nepal
  • Sofia Trejo, Professor ,Department of Mathematics, Mexico’s Autonomous Institute of Technology (ITAM)
  • Christina Isaicu, Management team, AI4Good Lab
  • Wilson Lee, Senior Machine Learning Research Engineer at The Trevor Project
  • Mitchel Fleming, Graduate; McGill Faculty of Law, articling student with Bereskin & Parr Toronto.
  • Samuel Curtis, AI Policy Researcher & Project Manager at The Future Society.
  • Brittany Wills, Software engineer, Twitter’s Machine Learning Ethics, Transparency, and Accountability team.
  • Garima Batra, Software engineer and designer, Master’s in Information science University of Toronto.
  • Matthew Hutson, Freelance science and technology writer, Contributing Writer, The New Yorker.
  • Tiziana Zevallos, Design Researcher at All In.

Download  Full report in PDF form
Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

🔍 SEARCH

Spotlight

A rock embedded with intricate circuit board patterns, held delicately by pale hands drawn in a ghostly style. The contrast between the rough, metallic mineral and the sleek, artificial circuit board illustrates the relationship between raw natural resources and modern technological development. The hands evoke human involvement in the extraction and manufacturing processes.

Tech Futures: The Fossil Fuels Playbook for Big Tech: Part I

Close-up of a cat sleeping on a computer keyboard

Tech Futures: The threat of AI-generated code to the world’s digital infrastructure

The undying sun hangs in the sky, as people gather around signal towers, working through their digital devices.

Dreams and Realities in Modi’s AI Impact Summit

Illustration of a coral reef ecosystem

Tech Futures: Diversity of Thought and Experience: The UN’s Scientific Panel on AI

This image shows a large white, traditional, old building. The top half of the building represents the humanities (which is symbolised by the embedded text from classic literature which is faintly shown ontop the building). The bottom section of the building is embossed with mathematical formulas to represent the sciences. The middle layer of the image is heavily pixelated. On the steps at the front of the building there is a group of scholars, wearing formal suits and tie attire, who are standing around at the enternace talking and some of them are sitting on the steps. There are two stone, statute-like hands that are stretching the building apart from the left side. In the forefront of the image, there are 8 students - which can only be seen from the back. Their graduation gowns have bright blue hoods and they all look as though they are walking towards the old building which is in the background at a distance. There are a mix of students in the foreground.

Tech Futures: Co-opting Research and Education

related posts

  • Evaluating a Methodology for Increasing AI Transparency: A Case Study

    Evaluating a Methodology for Increasing AI Transparency: A Case Study

  • On the Challenges of Using Black-Box APIs for Toxicity Evaluation in Research

    On the Challenges of Using Black-Box APIs for Toxicity Evaluation in Research

  • Will an Artificial Intellichef be Cooking Your Next Meal at a Michelin Star Restaurant?

    Will an Artificial Intellichef be Cooking Your Next Meal at a Michelin Star Restaurant?

  • Robustness and Usefulness in AI Explanation Methods

    Robustness and Usefulness in AI Explanation Methods

  • Distributed Governance: a Principal-Agent Approach to Data Governance - Part 1 Background & Core Def...

    Distributed Governance: a Principal-Agent Approach to Data Governance - Part 1 Background & Core Def...

  • Auditing for Human Expertise

    Auditing for Human Expertise

  • Survey of EU Ethical Guidelines for Commercial AI: Case Studies in Financial Services

    Survey of EU Ethical Guidelines for Commercial AI: Case Studies in Financial Services

  • Research summary: PolicyKit: Building Governance in Online Communities

    Research summary: PolicyKit: Building Governance in Online Communities

  • Abhishek Gupta on AI Ethics at the HBS Tech Conference (Keynote Summary)

    Abhishek Gupta on AI Ethics at the HBS Tech Conference (Keynote Summary)

  • The AI Carbon Footprint and Responsibilities of AI Scientists

    The AI Carbon Footprint and Responsibilities of AI Scientists

Partners

  •  
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer


Articles

Columns

AI Literacy

The State of AI Ethics Report


 

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.

Contact

Donate


  • © 2025 MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.