• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy.

  • Content
    • The State of AI Ethics
    • The AI Ethics Brief
    • The Living Dictionary
    • Research Summaries
    • Columns
      • The Ethics of Computer Vision
      • Social Context in LLM Research: the BigScience Approach
      • Recess
      • Like Talking to a Person
      • Sociology of AI Ethics
      • The New Heartbeat of Healthcare
      • Office Hours
      • Permission to Be Uncertain
      • AI Application Spotlight
      • Ethical AI Startups
    • Publications
  • Community
    • Events
    • Learning Community
    • Code of Conduct
  • Team
  • Donate
  • About
    • Our Open Access Policy
    • Our Contributions Policy
    • Press
  • Contact
  • 🇫🇷
Subscribe

Combatting Anti-Blackness in the AI Community

August 10, 2021 by MAIEI

🔬 Research summary by Connor Wright, our Partnerships Manager.

[Original paper by Devin Guillory]


Overview: Racism has the potential to establish itself in every corner of society, with the AI community being no different. With a mix of observations and advice, the paper harbours a need for change alongside the potential for the academic environment to manifest it. While some of the steps involved carry risk, the danger of not doing so is even greater.


Introduction

How badly does the AI community need diversity? What is academia’s role in this process? Themes surrounding how those in the AI community can help to combat systemic racial injustice are lightly touched upon through an academic’s lens. Here, acknowledging how racism permeates into every corner of our society is an important first step. However, further disparities and changes are still left unturned, with the AI community suffering as a result if nothing is done.

Key Insights

Discrepancies in resources

The AI field boasts some invisible barriers to entry between candidates of different ethnicities wanting access. These present themselves in 3 different categories:

  • Physical discrepancies. Disparities in resources, such as computers, are accentuated in a field that often requires large computing power to participate. Also included is the valuable asset of time.
  • Social discrepancies. Many AI jobs are now accessed through social networking and referrals. With there being gaps in physical resources, having access to the networking environments required varies hugely.
  • The Measures used – SAT systems have been seen to disproportionately disadvantage Black students.

In the admissions process, the disparity in terms of social and physical resources becomes even more apparent. Academia’s role, and the potential problems it can propagate, become even more critical with its relation to the AI community.

Academia as a well of information

Academia and research are a direct feeder into the AI community, so any poisoning found in the field will propagate to other parts of society. In this way, academic faculties will have to wholeheartedly buy into the effort of combating the issues at their root. One way to do this is through feedback.

The importance of feedback

Any positive change will need to be grounded in information from those who have gone through the system. The experiences of those who have been discriminated against can provide crucial insights into how the system can change. Without such feedback, the same procedures and the same discrimination will continue to be present.

Given the need for change, the paper also offers views on what can be done. The first of which involves jumping into the unknown.

Taking risks

Starting to accept candidates with different applications to years gone by can be a first step toward combating any effects of systemic racism. Looking at other institutions from which students come from or prioritising different characteristics in successful candidates. Not emphasising the need for experienced, a clear consequence of having lesser social and physical discrepancies, as much can be one way of doing this.

Reflecting on your environment

As a researcher, reflecting on which students you are mentoring can also bring up observations about the current diversity level in your environment. Furthermore, collaborating with different people than you usually can also help promote diversity by experiencing different ways of thinking. 

What diversity brings

Such alternative views are not the only thing that diversity brings. Having a faculty with varied backgrounds can also allow students of similar experiences to better relate to their professors. Some students may feel that they can only talk about specific problems with professors of similar backgrounds, with such a presence bringing great comfort to the academic experience. However, this is not to say that underrepresented members are solely thought of in the value they add to an in-group institution. Instead, the benefits of diversity should be a consequence of the diverse professors’ value.

Between the lines

The potential academia possesses to influence the proliferation of discriminatory practices in the AI community is extensive. Seen as the seed for the AI community, taking risks to effect change is a significant step for me. Nevertheless, any form of change will not be easy, especially if it involves self-reflection about your environment. However, not taking these steps could further drive any form of diversity away, which is simply a move that the AI community can no longer afford.

Category iconResearch Summaries

Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We write every week.
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • © MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE. All rights reserved 2021.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Creative Commons LicenseLearn more about our open access policy here.