• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Core Principles of Responsible AI
    • Accountability
    • Fairness
    • Privacy
    • Safety and Security
    • Sustainability
    • Transparency
  • Special Topics
    • AI in Industry
    • Ethical Implications
    • Human-Centered Design
    • Regulatory Landscape
    • Technical Methods
  • Living Dictionary
  • State of AI Ethics
  • AI Ethics Brief
  • 🇫🇷
Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Montreal AI Ethics Institute

Democratizing AI ethics literacy

Animism, Rinri, Modernization; the Base of Japanese Robotics

October 19, 2021

🔬 Research summary by Connor Wright, our Partnerships Manager.

[Original paper by Naho Kitano]


Overview: Technology is not going anywhere anytime soon, so why not respect it for what it is? The approach adopted by Japanese culture is to recognize how natural and technological phenomena have a soul that intertwines with ours. The result: a beautiful sight of human-technological relations indeed.


Introduction

Have you ever felt your soul harmoniously intertwined with a technology you are using? As part of the Japanese government’s aims for techno-integration, the Japanese tradition appeals for harmonious integration for the benefit of society. While the mystical element of this approach is notable, it creates a beautiful sight of what human-technology relationships can look like. Technology is now here to stay, so we may as well start off on a positive note.

Key Insights

The robotization of society is presented in a positive light

To appropriately set the scene, the robotization and technologization of society are seen as a positive in Japanese culture. Interestingly, the change is seen as so much of a positive that the efforts placed on ethical considerations are not too deep. For, it is a cultural assumption that robots will be designed to keep the society’s ethical values anyways. One way to explain the Japanese people’s confidence is through exploring the role of spirit.

The existence of spirits

A strong Japanese cultural belief resides in how natural phenomena have spirits. Traditionally,  this applied to the sun, moon and mountains, which had their own spirits and associated Gods. Subsequently, each God had a name and was assigned characteristics while having perceived control over natural events. Thanks to the technological revolution, the belief was expanded to artificial objects, which are believed to have souls in harmony with those of humans. Such belief consequently affects how the Japanese people interact with these objects, pleasantly seen when applied to tools.

How this applies to tools

Artificial tools made out of natural and unnatural phenomena possess anima (a soul). When in contact with humans, these objects are seen to work in tandem. Both the human and tool anima work harmoniously together. The relationship runs deep, seeing as tools are often companions for life, leading to them bearing names. Resultantly, the tools were traditionally inscribed with the owner’s name and its date of first use when it took on its anima through coming into contact with humans.

The relationship between the human and their tool is respected even after it is no longer in use. Even today, tools that break are not thrown away but taken to a temple to be burned divinely. A sign of respect to how intertwined the instrument had become with its human. For example, in 2005, Tmsuk Co. Ltd. took their robot creation KIYOMORI to the shrine to pray for its success. 

However, what is the benefit of all of this?

Why talk about spirituality?

It is important to acknowledge that the spirituality mentioned is not to advocate for a tool’s subjectivity, but to show how it relates to its owner. It takes on and bears a spiritual connection with its human owner from the first minute it’s used, forming the basis of the Japanese “Rinri” (“Ethics”).

“Rinri” is the study of achieving harmony in human relationships, offering a guide on forming and maintaining lasting human relationships with the natural phenomena surrounding us. Each individual has a responsibility to the social wellbeing of their community. For example, in 2004, Mr. Koda apologised for disturbing the social peace and causing harm to the people of Japan due to the diplomatic storm created with his travelling to Iraq. Guided by the attitude of “social harmonization over the individual subjectivity”, the spirituality of Japanese culture aims to foster a lasting relationship with technology. We see an interconnected reliability on one another; the tool on the human for its anima and the human on the tool for the task at hand.

This is a wonderful sight if you ask me.

Between the lines

Thanks to my links with Ubuntu philosophy (see previous research summary and panel discussion), I’m a fan of the interconnectedness and community-orientated approach offered. I think relating to technology in this way readjusts how we are to use it, namely for the benefit of the community we live in. While there are warranted concerns about what kind of relationship derives from this interconnectedness (such as sexual), grounding the action in respect is the way to go. By respecting the technology for what it is and can do for us, we can better learn how to develop this relationship with others.

Want quick summaries of the latest research & reporting in AI ethics delivered to your inbox? Subscribe to the AI Ethics Brief. We publish bi-weekly.

Primary Sidebar

🔍 SEARCH

Spotlight

AI Policy Corner: Frontier AI Safety Commitments, AI Seoul Summit 2024

AI Policy Corner: The Colorado State Deepfakes Act

Special Edition: Honouring the Legacy of Abhishek Gupta (1992–2024)

AI Policy Corner: The Turkish Artificial Intelligence Law Proposal

From Funding Crisis to AI Misuse: Critical Digital Rights Challenges from RightsCon 2025

related posts

  • Research summary: Mass Incarceration and the Future of AI

    Research summary: Mass Incarceration and the Future of AI

  • Conversational Swarm Intelligence (CSI) Enhances Groupwise Deliberation

    Conversational Swarm Intelligence (CSI) Enhances Groupwise Deliberation

  • FairQueue: Rethinking Prompt Learning for Fair Text-to-Image Generation (NeurIPS 2024)

    FairQueue: Rethinking Prompt Learning for Fair Text-to-Image Generation (NeurIPS 2024)

  • The Secret Revealer: Generative Model-Inversion Attacks Against Deep Neural Networks (Research Summa...

    The Secret Revealer: Generative Model-Inversion Attacks Against Deep Neural Networks (Research Summa...

  • AI Ethics in the Public, Private, and NGO Sectors: A Review of a Global Document Collection

    AI Ethics in the Public, Private, and NGO Sectors: A Review of a Global Document Collection

  • Research summary: Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelli...

    Research summary: Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelli...

  • Post-Mortem Privacy 2.0: Theory, Law and Technology

    Post-Mortem Privacy 2.0: Theory, Law and Technology

  • Conformity Assessments and Post-market Monitoring: A Guide to the Role of Auditing in the Proposed E...

    Conformity Assessments and Post-market Monitoring: A Guide to the Role of Auditing in the Proposed E...

  • Research summary: Machine Learning Fairness - Lessons Learned

    Research summary: Machine Learning Fairness - Lessons Learned

  • DICES Dataset: Diversity in Conversational AI Evaluation for Safety

    DICES Dataset: Diversity in Conversational AI Evaluation for Safety

Partners

  •  
    U.S. Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute Consortium (AISIC) at NIST

  • Partnership on AI

  • The LF AI & Data Foundation

  • The AI Alliance

Footer

Categories


• Blog
• Research Summaries
• Columns
• Core Principles of Responsible AI
• Special Topics

Signature Content


• The State Of AI Ethics

• The Living Dictionary

• The AI Ethics Brief

Learn More


• About

• Open Access Policy

• Contributions Policy

• Editorial Stance on AI Tools

• Press

• Donate

• Contact

The AI Ethics Brief (bi-weekly newsletter)

About Us


Founded in 2018, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) is an international non-profit organization equipping citizens concerned about artificial intelligence and its impact on society to take action.


Archive

  • © MONTREAL AI ETHICS INSTITUTE. All rights reserved 2024.
  • This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  • Learn more about our open access policy here.
  • Creative Commons License

    Save hours of work and stay on top of Responsible AI research and reporting with our bi-weekly email newsletter.